The Seattle Times
Nation & World

Low-graphic news index | Mobile site


Sunday, May 12, 2013 - Page updated at 06:01 a.m.

U.S. handing off troubled Afghan dam project

By Shashank Bengali
Tribune Washington Bureau

KAJAKI, Afghanistan — After struggling for more than a decade to upgrade a huge hydroelectric plant in a volatile region that saw heavy American losses in fighting with the Taliban, the United States is trying a new approach: Let the Afghans take charge.

U.S. officials are handing responsibility — and up to $80 million — to President Hamid Karzai’s government to finish refurbishing the Kajaki Dam and power system in southern Afghanistan as President Obama brings home U.S. troops and cuts back Washington’s nation-building experiment in the country.

No project symbolizes America’s vast ambitions — or deep frustrations — in Afghanistan more than the effort to boost production from Kajaki Dam to provide electricity to the Taliban heartland, a goal military commanders have long deemed essential to blunting the insurgency.

But ceding control of the mammoth development project carries clear risks. Chief among them: The Afghan government may further delay or abandon construction, turning one of the largest investments in the nearly $100 billion U.S. relief and reconstruction effort into an enduring example of failure.

The handover of the Kajaki project reflects the challenge the Obama administration faces as American military involvement diminishes: closing out the U.S. combat role while entrusting Afghan institutions with protecting hard-won security and development gains.

U.S. officials in Kabul, the capital, say the state-run utility, Da Afghanistan Breshna Sherkat, known as DABS, will finish work at Kajaki by the end of 2017 — 12 years after the dam upgrade began and three years after U.S. combat troops are scheduled to depart Afghanistan.

“It’s great news for us that the (Afghan) government has shown this kind of interest and ownership,” said Ken Yamashita, Kabul mission director for the U.S. Agency for International Development, known as USAID, which has managed the project. “It’s very rewarding to us to see ... that DABS is now capable of doing this.”

But others question the 4-year-old utility’s competence and experience, as well as the government’s commitment to a project that insurgents have violently opposed. To finish the construction, Afghan troops must secure a crucial supply road leading to the dam that has come under frequent attack.

Obama’s decision to increase U.S. troops in 2010 focused on retaking ground in southern Afghanistan. Some of the fiercest fighting occurred in Helmand province, where at least 29 Marines were killed clearing the road to Kajaki. Many others were grievously wounded.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, then-commander of U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, argued at the time that improving Kajaki Dam would create jobs and promote agriculture, thus weakening support for the insurgency.

“It’s safe to say the Marines have a jaundiced view of (the handover) given the sacrifices they made to clear the area,” a former U.S. official in Kabul said.

Until this year, Black & Veatch, an engineering company based in Overland Park, Kan., had a $266 million contract that included installing an 18-megawatt turbine at Kajaki that would increase the dam’s peak electrical generation by more than half.

But during a visit to Washington in January, Karzai demanded that more development work be funneled through his government. He specifically cited the dam.

Although many at USAID opposed the move, the agency rewrote the contract to put DABS in charge of the turbine. The Afghan utility is expected to select a construction company this year to finish the work at a cost of $60 million to $80 million, according to preliminary estimates.

“As with any large infrastructure project, this one is with risk,” Yamashita said. “We’re all committed to making it succeed.”

Nestled in dun-colored hills, the hydroelectric complex — an aging power station, a 300-foot-high earthen dam and an emerald-green reservoir — was built in 1953 by the American engineering giant Morrison-Knudsen.

In the mid-1970s, USAID installed two turbines in the dam’s power station, but the complex decayed over the next quarter-century of Soviet occupation, civil war and Taliban rule.

By 2001, the station was barely producing power. Washington bureaucrats flush with post-Sept. 11 dollars seized on the idea of a third turbine, which would boost the dam’s 33-megawatt peak output. It would provide electricity to Helmand and neighboring Kandahar province, traditional Taliban strongholds.

In 2005, USAID contracted a Chinese government company to install the third turbine. But by the time the Chinese were ready to transport it to the dam, British forces had taken over Helmand from U.S. troops and were battling a rejuvenated insurgency.

It took a six-day military operation involving 4,000 British troops, backed by U.S. airstrikes, just to deliver the massive apparatus to the dam in the summer of 2008.

But the Chinese engineers left Kajaki that fall, claiming a Taliban kidnapping threat. Since then, the turbine parts have sat in dozens of huge metal containers, unopened, in dirt at the dam compound.

U.S. combat units now have departed the area, leaving Afghan soldiers and police in charge.

It’s far from clear that the Afghan utility has the experience to administer the project. A recent audit by the Pentagon’s special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction found that $23 million in U.S. gear had gone unused by DABS in Helmand and Kandahar because the utility “lacked the capacity to install and manage the equipment.”

Mirwais Alami, DABS’ chief commercial officer, said the utility would work closely with USAID and others on what is its biggest project by far. “This was a very good decision by the Americans,” he said at his office in Kabul.

While insurgents and some Afghan villagers remain skeptical of the U.S. role in Kajaki, DABS officials are spreading the word to local elders that the hydroelectric project is now Afghan-run.

“The people are very interested in supporting this project,” Alami said. “We had thousands of foreign-security forces and no progress. This has gone on for five, six, eight years. It should really have only taken one year.”

Joseph Tanfani in the Tribune Washington Bureau contributed to this report.


Low-graphic news index
E-mail us
Search archive
RSS feeds
Graphic-enabled home page
Mobile site


Copyright © 2010 The Seattle Times Company