$3 billion in airport improvements exempt from federal cuts
While 149 control towers are shutting, sequestration doesn’t affect a laundry list of airport projects, putting spotlight on politics of aviation.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
MILWAUKEE — As budget cuts force the Federal Aviation Administration to carve chunks out of the nation’s air traffic control system, the agency cannot touch a program that allocated $17.9 million for airport improvements on the Pacific island of Saipan. Or $9.4 million for soundproofing two elementary schools near Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport.
Those projects are exempt from the federally mandated budget cuts known as sequestration because they are part of the Airport Improvement Program that in 2012 designated more than $3 billion for projects around the globe, from $23 million for a new airport in Kaktovik, Alaska (population 239), to tens of millions of dollars for projects at airports in Wisconsin. The Airport Improvement Program was not included among the sequestration cuts.
Yet, now air traffic controllers are being furloughed and 149 control towers are being closed — compromising air safety, some airport officials say. (Washington state airfields facing tower closure are in Renton, Olympia, Yakima, Tacoma and Spokane.)
The situation gets to the heart of the difficulty of cleaning up the nation’s fiscal mess: One person’s spending boondoggle is a crucial piece of someone else’s safety, quality of life or economic well-being.
“We’ve met the enemy and it’s us,” said Jeff Baum, CEO of Wisconsin Aviation, based in Watertown, Wisc., who is also a pilot and vice chairman of the Air Charter Safety Foundation. “We want everything and we don’t want to pay for it.”
Says economist David J. Ward of NorthStar Consulting Group in Madison, Wisc.: “It’s not like everybody can look around and say it’s somebody else’s fault. The public has to decide which way we are going.
“In the last election, we decided to put the current (Democratic) administration back in the White House and the Republicans back in control of the House. That must mean something,” he said.
For now, it means we’re in for more political theater in Washington, D.C., while the nation’s air traffic control system shrinks as part of the FAA’s plan to meet the $637 million in cuts it’s been told to make under sequestration.
The U.S. air travel system is the safest anywhere. Baum said there are about 14,000 landing sites in the United States. Of those, about 5,000 are paved runways open for public use. About 500 of those have operating control towers.
The towers being eliminated are operated by private contractors.
“The vast majority of airports in America never had a control tower,” Baum said. “Can (small airports) operate without them? Absolutely.”
But the sequestration cuts would remove a layer of safety at airports where tower staffing is being eliminated.
At Waukesha County (Wisc.) Airport, for example, student pilots are flying and landing in the same airspace as charter jets that are capable of cruising speeds approaching Mach 1, said airport director Kurt Stanich. He’s perplexed by the FAA decision to close towers, including his.
“It just doesn’t make sense to us, looking at the FAA the way we do as the ones who regulate safety and operations and pilot certifications, for them to go through and just cut a program like this,” he said. “An airport with an air traffic control tower provides a level of safety that you don’t get at an airport that’s without a control tower. We think that the FAA can make smarter cuts that don’t affect the safety of airplanes and navigation across the country. It doesn’t make sense.”
Peter Moll, airport director at Wittman Regional Airport in Oshkosh, Wisc., said taking away his airport’s control tower “is almost like taking all the traffic signals away in town. Every intersection becomes uncontrolled and you have to slow down at least or stop and check for traffic. It just makes it a lot more difficult.”
The airport’s air traffic controllers, Moll said, are relied on to provide “that second set of eyes, even though pilots and ground vehicles have to keep an eye out for aircraft.”
Wittman is the site of the EAA AirVenture, which will take place from July 29 to Aug. 4. The event will draw thousands of people, and activity at the airport will make it among the busiest in the world. The EAA issued a statement Friday saying the event “will not be adversely affected” by the FAA decision.
The whole thought process that led to the cuts is messed up, Baum said.
“Clearly, no one is saying ‘OK, our funding is going to be cut by millions of dollars,’ ” he said. “ ‘Where can we become more efficient? Which programs do we really not need to be doing anymore?’ ”
The elimination of towers won’t put airports out of business, nor is it likely to prevent aircraft from using them.
The circumstances that led to the control tower cuts are hindering the nation’s economy, said Ward, the economist.
“There was never a thought that the federal government was particularly efficient at pointing out high-return investments,” he said. “But it’s very clear now that we’re getting a situation where the federal money is not being funneled to where it is most efficient.
“All the clutter and disputes aside, that’s the real economic problem,” Ward added. “If you keep doing this, it creates a drag on the economy. It’s irrational and ... it leads to the inefficient use of scarce resources. Neither side seems to be willing to budge. That’s where we are.”