Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published February 16, 2013 at 2:31 PM | Page modified February 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (5)
  • Print

No central agency oversees, inspects cruise ships

No single entity or country oversees or regulates the cruise-line industry and its ships, which can resemble minicities floating at sea.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Welcome to the world without regulation. MORE
POKYHOMT, "Democrats' crisis du jour:" Oh yes, I'm sure that's your... MORE
".....track record for cleanliness? Want to assess how sanitary the food is?"... MORE

advertising

MIAMI — A Byzantine maze of maritime rules and regulations, fragmented oversight and a patchwork quilt of nations that do business with cruise lines make it tough for consumers to assess the health and safety record of the ship they’re about to board in what for many is the vacation of a lifetime.

Want to know about a ship’s track record for cleanliness? Want to assess how sanitary the food is? It’s not that easy to find, in part because there’s no single entity or country that oversees or regulates the industry and its ships, which resemble minicities floating at sea.

In the case of Carnival Cruise Lines, the owner of the Carnival Triumph that spent days in the Gulf of Mexico disabled after an engine fire, the company is incorporated in Panama, its offices are based in Miami and its ships fly under the Bahamian flag, a matrix that is not unusual in the cruise-line industry.

For potential passengers seeking ship information, there’s no central database to determine a track record of safety or health inspections. No one agency regulates everything from the cruise line’s mechanical worthiness to the sanitation of its kitchens.

The U.S. Coast Guard inspects each cruise ship that docks in the U.S. every year for a range of issues, from operation of backup generators to the lifeboats. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains a database of recent disease outbreaks and other health-inspection information for cruise ships. Had Triumph vacationers looked up information about the cruise ship through those two agencies before boarding, they would have found mostly clean marks and few red flags.

When something goes wrong, as it did on Triumph, there are limits to how much the Coast Guard can investigate.

These are not new issues; they had been raised by members of Congress before the Triumph incident. “This horrible situation involving the Carnival Triumph is just the latest example in a long string of serious and troubling incidents involving cruise ships,” said Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., who led a committee hearing on cruise safety last year.

After the Costa Concordia ran aground last year off the coast of Giglio, Italy, Rockefeller held a Commerce Committee hearing to examine deficiencies in the cruise-line industry’s compliance with federal safety, security and environmental standards and review industry regulations.

“As I remarked then, they seem to have two lives: One is at port, where the Coast Guard can monitor their operations; the other is at sea where, it appears once they are beyond three nautical miles from shore, the world is theirs,” Rockefeller said in letter he wrote last week to Adm. Robert Papp Jr., the commandant of the Coast Guard.

The Triumph left Galveston, Texas, on Feb. 7 for a four-day cruise to Cozumel, Mexico. An engine-room fire paralyzed the ship last Sunday, leaving it adrift in the Gulf of Mexico. Passengers described nightmarish conditions on board: overflowing toilets, long lines for a short supply of food, foul odors, and tent cities where vacationers slept on deck. Tugboats slowly towed the 14-story vessel to Mobile, Ala. It arrived there late Thursday.

The U.S. Coast Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board will lend their expertise to the investigation, but in a support role. The probe will be led by the Bahamas Maritime Authority. The arrangement is commonplace and it puts U.S. agencies and investigators in a secondary position, even though the Triumph and other Carnival ships sail out of U.S. ports with primarily U.S. customers.

Inquiries to Carnival about inspections and foreign flags were met by a response from the Cruise Lines International Association, which represents all of the major cruise lines. Bud Darr, the group’s senior vice president for technical and regulatory affairs, said the industry is “very heavily regulated,” from the way ships are designed to how crews train for emergencies. He said standards are set by the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization (IMO).

But Jim Walker, a Miami maritime attorney and author of the www.cruiselawnews.com blog, said, “the IMO guidelines are not law, and there is no consequence if the cruise lines ignore the guidelines and recommendations. Customers have no way of knowing whether they are well maintained safely. There is no federal oversight with real teeth.”

In 2010, the IMO adopted rules that require any large cruise ship built after July 1 of that year to have a separate, redundant system able to maintain the ship’s propulsion, steering and so forth in case one engine is disabled by fire. The rules also mandate that ships be capable of maintaining basic services such as sanitation, water, food and lights in such circumstances.

The Triumph was built in 1999 and isn’t covered by the rules, as is the case for most ships among major cruise lines.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Seattle Sketcher Book

Seattle Sketcher Book

Take home the Seattle Sketcher's latest book! Available now.

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising