Advertising

The Blotter

The Times' criminal justice team looks behind the scenes and behind the headlines.

October 12, 2011 at 4:01 PM

Federal medical marijuana crackdown in Calif.; Washington next?

Posted by Jonathan Martin

U.S. Attorneys in California continue to ratchet up rhetoric against the state's booming medical marijuana dispensary industry, with news Wednesday that the chief federal prosecutor for San Diego is taking a hard look at advertising.

"I'm not just seeing print advertising," prosecutor Laura E. Duffy told the nonprofit investigative California Watch and KQED. "I'm actually hearing radio and seeing TV advertising. It's gone mainstream. Not only is it inappropriate -- one has to wonder what kind of message we're sending to our children -- it's against the law."

This been a bad two weeks for medical marijuana, particularly in California, one of 15 states that allow it, including Washington State.

Earlier this month, the four top federal prosecutors in California announced they gave several dispensaries 45 days to shut din in a move to stop what Andre Birotte, the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, called the "Costco-, Wal-Mart-type model that we see across California."

Days earlier, the IRS ruled that Oakland's Harborside collective, a pioneer in medical marijuana, cannot claim standard business deductions, crippling the financial infrastructure of dispensaries.

U.S. Attorneys under the Obama Administration have taken an increasingly belligerent approach, matching and even outpacing the George W. Bush Administration in clamping down on the booming medical marijuana market, including here in Washington.

California often has been a bellwether --- commercial and legally - in medical marijuana, raising the question of whether Seattle's dispensaries are in trouble. Jenny Durkan, the chief federal prosecutor in Seattle, gave a stern warning in my story about the crackdown in Spokane.

Emily Langlie, Durkan's spokeswoman, said the office doesn't comment on enforcement actions in other jurisdictions, but pointed back to Durkan's statement last month, which read:

"We never announce who or what we are investigating. The day before the Eastern Washington enforcement actions, those dispensaries thought they could operate without penalty. They were wrong. We have made it clear that we will not prosecute truly ill people, their actual caregivers or their doctors who determine that marijuana is an appropriate medical treatment. Many others are operating well outside that zone. The label 'medical marijuana' cannot be used as a shield to hide drug dealing and other criminal behavior. No one should take false comfort from lax local laws or marijuana industry lawyers. They risk federal prosecution, property forfeiture and other penalties."

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

If I ever get called for duty on a marihuana case jury I'll be sure to let the court know I have an open mind and can make a fair decision...  Posted on October 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM by Geo Smiley. Jump to comment
I was part of the jury selection process for a marijuana case. I made it clear that I would never vote to convict in a marijuana case. I got to...  Posted on October 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM by Hank Rearden. Jump to comment
2 words: JURY NULLIFICATION  Posted on October 13, 2011 at 8:53 AM by yepTHATguy. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Jan 4, 12 - 10:10 AM
New poll shows voters split on legalizing marijuana

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011