New appraisal rules may hurt homebuyers
New rules aimed at improving the home-appraisal process have many in the industry concerned that they will make it more difficult and costly for people to get mortgages and refinance.
If you want to buy a home or refinance your mortgage, you might not be all that concerned about how your lender selects the appraiser who figures out how much your home is worth.
But new rules intended to reduce appraisal fraud and curtail undue pressure on appraisers could have some dramatic repercussions for homebuyers and homeowners.
Proponents say the new rules will result in more-reliable appraisals, less fraud, lower costs and minimal disruption.
But critics expect less-accurate appraisals, delays in loan processing, higher costs and general misery for all concerned.
At issue is the "Home Valuation Code of Conduct," or HVCC, a four-page document that outlines appraisal-related practices to which lenders must adhere with respect to so-called "conventional" or "conforming" loans that they want to sell to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The code appears set to become effective May 1.
There are three main questions about the new code: Will the new rules take the pressure off appraisers? Will the new rules hinder mortgage shopping? Will the new rules make appraisals more costly?
Much of the controversy concerns how the code will affect mortgage brokers and appraisers. Both of these groups have been up in arms because they believe the new rules will curtail their business opportunities and income.
But these groups also have suggested that the new rules could result in less-accurate appraisals or higher appraisal fees, two outcomes that should raise an alarm for homebuyers and homeowners.
Here is a closer look at the issues.
Will the new rules take the pressure off appraisers?
No one disputes the axioms that property appraisals should be accurate, fair and impartial and that "inflated appraisals put both the lender and borrower in jeopardy," says Bill Garber, director of government and external relations at the Appraisal Institute, a Chicago-based professional organization for appraisers.
But there's still considerable disagreement over whether the new rules will put an end to the pressure, coercion and even threats that appraisers have faced to a greater or lesser degree since appraisals were invented.
The new code of conduct requires that lenders order appraisals either directly from appraisers, most of whom are independent contractors, or through appraisal management companies, which act as a sort of outsourced appraisal department for the lender.
This requirement means mortgage brokers will no longer be able to order appraisals for loans that will be sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Garber says there is "a good case to be made" that mortgage brokers shouldn't order appraisals because they earn their commission only if the appraiser's opinion of value is high enough for the lender to OK the loan.
While that case may indeed be solid, an argument also can be made that "all parties to the loan transaction have some incentive to obtain an appraisal at the highest possible value," as the Federal Trade Commission stated in a letter to Freddie Mac about the code.
Mortgage brokers want to earn that commission. Borrowers want to be able to buy the home or refinance a mortgage. Lenders want to be sure the property's value justifies the loan amount, but also want the loan to close so they can collect the fees.
Will the new rules hinder mortgage shopping?
A major concern is whether the code's ban on broker-ordered appraisals in connection with certain loans will impede borrowers' ability to shop around for a loan.
Garber says borrowers will still be able to shop around with the aid of a mortgage broker because an appraisal ordered by one lender "can be utilized by other lenders with proper procedures."
Mortgage brokers say otherwise. In a letter to Fannie Mae, George Hanzimanolis, 2007-08 president of the 25,000-member National Association of Mortgage Brokers, or NAMB, in McLean, Va., argued that the code would "impede consumers' ability to comparison shop" for loan products.
He also said the code would have an "adverse impact" on the mortgage market that would result in "fewer choices and increased costs for consumers."
"If mortgage brokers are prohibited from ordering appraisals, consumer costs will rise, contracts will be delayed and borrowers will be stripped of one of the primary benefits of working with a mortgage broker, namely, cost-effective and timely customer service," Hanzimanolis wrote.
The code will be "a horrible, monstrous disaster," says Joe Metzler, a mortgage specialist at Mortgages Unlimited in St. Paul, Minn.
He says that once the code becomes effective, mortgage brokers won't be able to speak informally to appraisers, much less order appraisals. That lack of communication could stymie some homeowners who want to refinance, but don't know whether they have enough equity in their home to do so.
The code was "designed to prevent the fraudulent appraisals that created a lot of the mess" in the mortgage sector, Metzler says. But he adds that in his experience appraisers have already become more conservative in their valuations.
"There is no one who is willing to, ahem, sharpen their pencil," he says.
Will the new rules make appraisals more costly?
Another major concern is whether these changes in how appraisals are ordered will increase borrowers' costs for appraisals.
Currently, mortgage brokers order half or more of all appraisals, according to Garber.
Once they are pushed out of the process, more appraisals likely will be ordered instead by appraisal-management companies, which control approximately 20 percent of the appraisal business, according to Garber.
These companies typically aren't paid for their services by the lender. Instead, they take a cut, which can be as much as 50 percent or more, of the appraiser's fee.
Garber says appraisal-management companies have put substantial downward pressure on appraisers' earnings; consequently, some experienced appraisers have exited the business.
Borrowers may be concerned about the effect of that exodus on the quality of appraisals since those who remain in the business may be only "minimally qualified," to use Garber's description. Appraisers may be forced to complete more appraisals more quickly due to lower fees for their services.
Plus, some appraisal-management companies are owned in part by lenders, which means the lender receives an indirect benefit from the appraisal fee. These types of affiliated business relationships among companies that provide real-estate settlement services aren't necessarily illegal. However, federal law requires that these relationships be disclosed to homebuyers to avoid the appearance of kickbacks, which are prohibited.
The link between lenders and appraisal-management companies have triggered two lawsuits. In one, homeowners claimed that an affiliated business relationship wasn't disclosed. In the other, homeowners claimed they were charged inflated appraisal fees due to an affiliated business relationship.
Finally, as if this set of circumstances wasn't complicated enough, the Federal Reserve recently released its own guidelines for appraisals. Will the Fed's "Interagency Appraisal Evaluation Guidelines" eventually trump the HVCC? Only time will tell.
Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
NEW - 10:00 PM
Reverse mortgages get more affordable, but be careful
UPDATE - 10:00 PM
Nation's Housing: Too much of a good deal?
UPDATE - 7:52 PM
Guardian to represent ailing Mastro in bankruptcy case
NEW - 10:00 PM
Spring-cleaning tips for the garage
Furniture & home furnishings
POST A FREE LISTING