Advertising

Go to the politics section for more local and national politics coverage.

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

September 1, 2011 at 9:55 AM

McKenna wins health-care suit, loses Goldmark case in state Supreme Court

Posted by Andrew Garber

Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna won one and lost one in two decisions handed down by the state Supreme Court on Thursday.

The court ruled McKenna was within his rights to join more than a dozen other attorneys general in the effort to challenge the national health-care law approved by a Democratic Congress last year.

But in a second case, the court ruled McKenna's office must represent state Lands Commissioner Peter Goldmark in a case dealing with whether to allow a public-utility district to run a power line on Okanogan County property owned by state Department of Natural Resources.

In the power line case, Goldmark last year lost a court battle that allowed the Okanogan Public Utility District (PUD) to condemn state trust lands so it could build a new transmission line across the property. McKenna declined to appeal on behalf of the state, so Goldmark asked the state Supreme Court to force him.

The court on Thursday ruled that state law "expressly requires the attorney general to represent the commissioner in any court when so requested by the commissioner. This duty is mandatory, and the attorney general has no discretion to deny the commissioner legal representation."

In the health-care case, McKenna joined other attorneys general last year in the effort led by Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum to file a suit claiming, in part, that Congress doesn't have the constitutional right to force people to get health coverage.

Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes later sued McKenna, arguing he overstepped his authority.

The state Supreme Court ruled that "the people of the state of Washington have, by statute, vested the attorney general with broad authority, and Attorney General McKenna's decision to sue to enjoin the enforcement of (the health care law) falls within that broad authority. As such, Attorney General McKenna has no mandatory duty to withdraw the State from the multistate litigation."

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

yurji: September 1, 2011 at 6:43 PM Rating: (3) (2) Report abuse "The Democrats want to set a precedence that ignores the Constitution....  Posted on September 2, 2011 at 9:43 AM by DonkeyControl. Jump to comment
"The point was just that you left out a lot of people in your list who are in the group voluntarily. "Until then my broken leg's on...  Posted on September 2, 2011 at 9:30 AM by opie of mayberry. Jump to comment
Obamacare is toast! Either the Supreme Court will effective neuter this POS legislation or it will be job 1 for the new 113th Congress when...  Posted on September 2, 2011 at 7:01 AM by ratio decidendi. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers the Eastside.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers local government.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.

Lynn Thompson
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Bob Young
Covers King County and urban affairs.