Go to the politics section for more local and national politics coverage.
Politics Northwest
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print
Share
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Referendum 71 case April 28
Posted by Janet Tu
The U.S. Supreme Court has set April 28 as the date it will hear arguments over whether those who sign petitions for ballot measures can keep their identities confidential -- a case stemming from the Referendum 71 battle last year.
The High Court had decided in January to hear the case -- referred to as Doe v. Reed.
At issue is whether signing a ballot petition is a form of political speech protected by the First Amendment. And if so, whether a portion of the state's Public Records Act violates the signers' First Amendment rights. The law subjects to public disclosure the identities of those who sign referendum or initiative petitions.
A Supreme Court decision likely will have ramifications beyond this state.
Twenty-seven states have either referendum or initiative processes, and the Internet has made it far easier to publicize the names of those who sign petitions for such ballot measures.
Referendum 71 asked voters last fall to approve or reject a recently expanded state domestic-partnership law that grants "everything but marriage" benefits to gay and lesbian couples. Voters approved the measure.


- Mayor: Kings deal about 'not letting somebody take something that isn't theirs'
- Sex-with-animals advocate told to stay off Internet
- Pot rules taking shape; public gets a taste of what’s ahead
- Seahawks' Bruce Irvin suspended for four games
- Man survives bear attack after wife cracks it on head
- Boston bombing suspect’s note explains motive, officials say
- Mariners beat Yankees again, near .500
- David Stern's Seattle sucker punch shows we must stop being a pawn in NBA's game | Jerry Brewer
- North Bend intruder had job, was father of five
- Drugs, guns, pipe bomb found after 6 arrested in Shoreline
- Kings moving closer to sale to Sacramento group
362 - House committee to grill ousted IRS chief
313 - Game thread: Mariners try to contain high-octane Indians
296 - Game thread: Can 'Safeco Joe' expand his Mariners contribution?
285 - Another new Husky? Blakley gives commitment to UW
134 - Why is any political group exempt from paying taxes?
105 - Background checks are a reasonable way to curb gun violence
59 - Seahawks' Bruce Irvin suspended for four games
30 - Sacramento Kings sale celebrated by city
26 - Editorial: Wake up the IRS watchdogs
23
- Pot rules taking shape; public gets a taste of what’s ahead
- Marine, dog partner reunited in surprise ceremony
- Columbia Hills State Park is a Gorge wonder
- LGBT students get $600,000 in scholarships from 2 groups
- Sex-with-animals advocate told to stay off Internet
- Why is any political group exempt from taxes?
- 5 favorite day trips
- Helping high-school students navigate the next step | Lynne K. Varner / Times editorial columnist
- Contractor at Wade’s gun range cited for lead exposure
- Lakeside delights at Little Water Cantina | Happy Hour

Contributors
Jim Brunner
Covers politics.
Keith Ervin
Covers the Eastside.
Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.
Emily Heffter
Covers local government.
Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.
Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.
Lynn Thompson
Covers Seattle City Hall.
Bob Young
Covers King County and urban affairs.
