Originally published December 8, 2008 at 4:42 PM | Page modified December 9, 2008 at 11:04 AM
E.J. Dionne / Syndicated columnist
Barack Obama's choice of Shinseki signals that truth-tellers are wanted
In naming retired Gen. Eric K. Shinseki to lead the Department of Veterans Affairs, President-elect Barack Obama declared that truth-tellers and dissenters would be welcome in his administration.
Syndicated columnist
WASHINGTON — In naming retired Gen. Eric K. Shinseki as veterans affairs secretary, President-elect Barack Obama made what may be the most politically and morally significant choice of his transition.
Politically, Obama has been moving aggressively to close a wide gap between Democrats and the military — and particularly between the party and the officer corps — that began growing in the Vietnam era.
Shinseki's appointment can be seen as one of several steps the incoming president has taken to win respect and trust within the armed forces. Obama's decision to keep Robert Gates as defense secretary and his choice of retired Marine Gen. James Jones as White House national-security adviser are of a piece in sending a strong, sympathetic signal to the uniformed services.
Morally, Shinseki's appointment marks the vindication of a man who was punished for telling the truth in the run-up to the Iraq War.
As the Army's chief of staff, Shinseki famously told Congress in February 2003 that "several hundred thousand soldiers" would be needed to stabilize Iraq.
Shinseki was quickly rebuked by then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz for being "way off the mark." Vice President Cheney told Tim Russert on "Meet the Press" a few weeks later that "to suggest that we need several hundred thousand troops there after military operations cease, after the conflict ends, I don't think is accurate. I think that's an overstatement." It was no overstatement.
In naming Shinseki to lead the Department of Veterans Affairs, Obama implicitly set a high standard for himself by declaring that truth-tellers and dissenters would be welcome in his administration.
There is a link between Shinseki's prophetic courage and the opening Obama has with the military: The war in Iraq has had a decidedly different impact on the politics of the armed services than did the Vietnam War. Iraq has created a potential problem for Republicans because many in both the officer corps and the enlisted ranks were alienated by the way President Bush and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld handled the conflict, particularly in its early stages.
After Vietnam, by contrast, many in the military blamed liberals and the left for failing to give them a chance to win a war in which they continued to see triumph as a possibility. Some opponents of the Vietnam War turned sharply on the military and "the war machine." It remains a scandal that veterans of that conflict often bore the brunt of the war's unpopularity when they returned home.
In a seminal 1997 article in The Atlantic that addressed "The Widening Gap Between the Military and Society," Thomas Ricks, a longtime Washington Post military affairs correspondent, found that officers disproportionately identified themselves as conservative Republicans. Ricks saw the "classic military values of sacrifice, unity, self-discipline, and considering the interests of the group before those of the individual" as being increasingly at odds with the values of a highly individualistic and increasingly fragmented society.
The battle over the role of gays in the military at the outset of Bill Clinton's presidency only deepened the divide that Ricks described.
Obama, who promised repeatedly during his campaign to "turn the page" on past cultural and political divisions, has clearly set out to do precisely that where the military is concerned. He is building on a little-noticed veterans outreach effort launched by Nancy Pelosi before she became House speaker and spearheaded by her former aide Burns Strider. Democrats called attention to shortfalls in programs for veterans in Bush's budgets and built new alliances with veterans organizations.
The Shinseki appointment gives Obama a way to marry the Democrats' twin critiques of the Bush past. The new president has sent a strong signal that he will listen more closely than his predecessor did to doubters and skeptics in the uniformed ranks. And by making an admired soldier responsible for helping veterans recover from their wounds and rebuild their lives, Obama aims to show that his party's commitment to the needs of those who served their country was more than just campaign chatter.
The 66-year-old Shinseki, who won two Purple Hearts during his service in Vietnam, has the opportunity to heal the social and political wounds of two wars: the one in which he fought decades ago, and the more recent conflict whose burdens he anticipated so clearly.
E.J. Dionne's column appears regularly on editorial pages of The Times. His e-mail address is postchat@aol.com
2008, Washington Post Writers Group
NEW - 5:04 PM
A Florida U.S. Senate candidate and crimes against writing
NEW - 5:05 PM
Guest columnist: Washington Legislature is closing budget gap with student debt
Guest columnist: Seattle Public Schools must do more than replace the chief
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'
Neal Peirce / Syndicated columnist: How do states afford needed investment and budget cuts?
general classifieds
Garage & estate salesFurniture & home furnishings
Electronics
just listed
More listings
POST A FREE LISTING
- No question: Russell Wilson's in charge now
- Amazon’s plan for giant spheres gets mixed reaction
- Man shot by FBI had ties to Boston bombing suspect
- Is Catholic Church taking over health care in Washington? | Danny Westneat
- Ex-Great Wolf Lodge lifeguard charged with rape of guest, 14
- Percy Harvin already impressing Seahawks teammates, coaches
- ‘The Hangover Part III’: a big headache | Movie review
- McNerney: Boeing will squeeze suppliers and cut jobs
- High-level Starbucks exec heads to Kohl’s
- Sinking Mariners lose sixth straight game; changes ahead?
- Is Catholic Church taking over health care in Washington?
292 - Official: Treasury played no role in IRS targeting
241 - Game thread: Mariners try to end trip with a win
218 - Podcast: Mariners season hits crucial point
141 - Mariners head home facing key decisions as losing streak hits six
125 - Businesses refuse service to gays
121 - Mariners shuffle lineup, put Bay at leadoff and Morse at No. 3
84 - View from Sacramento: David Stern deserves statue, thanks
81 - GOP questions IRS scrutiny of anti-abortion groups
68 - Police: 1 dead, 2 injured in attack in London
65
- Is Catholic Church taking over health care in Washington? | Danny Westneat
- Amazon’s plan for giant spheres gets mixed reaction
- Catholic schools update to compete with charter schools
- McNerney: Boeing will squeeze suppliers and cut jobs
- UW Medicine, Catholic health system to have ‘strategic affiliation’
- Doctors save Ohio boy by ‘printing’ an airway tube | Close-up
- China’s wealthy paying cash for Eastside luxury homes
- No question: Russell Wilson's in charge now
- deafReview gives a voice to deaf consumers
- Ex-Great Wolf Lodge lifeguard charged with rape of guest, 14



