Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

February 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (3)
  • Print

Protection from toxic flame retardant

Evidence regarding risk of flame retardant

The recent opinion piece by Maureen Judge warrants some clarification [“Protect our homes, our children from toxic flame retardant,” Opinion, Feb. 13].

In her criticism of what we assume is the flame retardant TDCPP, the author fails to mention that the European Union completed a comprehensive risk assessment of the chemical in 2008. The assessment concluded: “There is at present no need for further information and/or testing and no need for risk reduction measures beyond those which are being applied already.”

It goes on to say that this conclusion “applies to combined exposure for the endpoints acute toxicity, irritation, sensitization, repeated dose toxicity, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, effects on male fertility and developmental toxicity.”

It is important for readers to understand that flame retardants play a unique role in fire prevention and fire safety. They not only can prevent fires from starting, but if a fire does occur, they can slow down the spread of the fire and improve the opportunity for safe escape.

--Jackson Morrill, director, North American Flame Retardant Alliance, Washington, D.C.


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Wow, an alliance just for flame retardants. I'm sure that his economic interest in... MORE
Keep It and use less toxic Alternatives. Would you like to list some "less... MORE
Keep It and use less toxic Alternatives. MORE

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon


The Seattle Times photographs

Seattle space needle and mountains

Purchase The Seattle Times images


Advertising