Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor
Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.
Protection from toxic flame retardant
Evidence regarding risk of flame retardant
The recent opinion piece by Maureen Judge warrants some clarification [“Protect our homes, our children from toxic flame retardant,” Opinion, Feb. 13].
In her criticism of what we assume is the flame retardant TDCPP, the author fails to mention that the European Union completed a comprehensive risk assessment of the chemical in 2008. The assessment concluded: “There is at present no need for further information and/or testing and no need for risk reduction measures beyond those which are being applied already.”
It goes on to say that this conclusion “applies to combined exposure for the endpoints acute toxicity, irritation, sensitization, repeated dose toxicity, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, effects on male fertility and developmental toxicity.”
It is important for readers to understand that flame retardants play a unique role in fire prevention and fire safety. They not only can prevent fires from starting, but if a fire does occur, they can slow down the spread of the fire and improve the opportunity for safe escape.
--Jackson Morrill, director, North American Flame Retardant Alliance, Washington, D.C.
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Sen. Patty Murray plans to reintroduce Wild Olympics bill
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Gun bill allows for police inspection
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM President Obama's early childhood education expansion proposal
Feb 21 - 7:00 AM Don't restrict public's right to access information
Feb 20 - 4:00 PM Lake Burien: public, but private










