Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

February 15, 2013 at 7:00 AM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (3)
  • Print

Senate conflict over Violence Against Women Act

Hasty Senate decisions bypass fiscal responsibility

It is disappointing that the Senate rejected Sen. Chuck Grassley’s, R-Iowa, proposed amendments to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which included some very modest financial accountability provisions for VAWA recipients [“Senate poised to renew Violence Against Women Act,” seattletimes.com, Feb. 7]. In its haste to pander to the women’s vote, the Senate approved continued handouts of millions of taxpayer dollars without any strings attached.

Grassley’s proposal recognized that a Justice Department audit of VAWA grantees found a high rate of irregularities in fund expenditures or record-keeping. It also provided for more protections against alleged victims using fraud and false allegations of abuse to take advantage of VAWA’s “get a free green card” program.

Apparently, fiscal responsibility with taxpayer subsidies goes out the window when the money is earmarked for women/victims. Aside from the blatant gender bias inherent in the act, the least we should get is some financial accountability.

--Lisa Scott, Bellevue


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
What a sexist proposal. MORE
Centerist1 says: would even eliminate the language “woman” from the... MORE
The letter writer claims that the Grassley amendments would be "fiscally... MORE

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon



Advertising