Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

February 13, 2013 at 7:00 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

New security considerations in U.S. embassies

Diplomats need more security

Kenneth Torp seems to think that what has been going on at the recent hearings in Washington, D.C., has been “seemingly endless second-guessing” about “presumptive security lapses in Benghazi,” [“Don’t turn U.S. embassies into bunkers,” Opinion, Feb. 10].

I would submit that there were security lapses, and they were not “presumptive” but real. What a disgrace!

Torp regales the readers with stories of what it was like to travel in Mali in 1972. All well and good, but this is not 1972 and he is setting up a straw man when he suggests that we now are in danger of further security restrictions, which make it more difficult for diplomats to do their job. Our diplomats asked for help before the Benghazi attack and did not get it. Then they asked for help during the attack and did not get it.

--Richard Prout, Seattle


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon


Autos news and research

Concept car: Bentley introduces hybrid

Concept car: Bentley introduces hybrid


Advertising