Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

January 12, 2013 at 7:00 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (17)
  • Print

Use of torture on terror subjects criticized

Coercive measures work

Michael Marks is wrong, and what is worse, he must know it [“Torture interrogations do not work,” Opinion, Jan. 8].

Coercive interrogation does work quite well where it has been determined that the subject knows but elects to withhold the required information. Marks’ “rapport-based” interrogation, while perhaps politically correct, only works on “rapport-based” subjects, and they are few in the terrorist community and are usually informed of little if any vital data as they by definition cannot be depended upon to secure it.

Foolishly calling noninjurious, coercive interrogation like waterboarding “torture” trivializes the suffering of legitimate torture victims and it shamefully ignores that coercive interrogation saves countless American lives, both military and civilian.

--William Slusher, Okanogan


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
? Like many here in Washington State, I consider myself an independent. On some issues... MORE
I recall the experience of Christ... jailed by the government on trumped-up charges and... MORE
Liberals like to pretend that terrorists don't exist and that wars are merely fought to... MORE

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon



Advertising