Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

November 13, 2012 at 8:00 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (9)
  • Print

Election reveals Washington's political divide

Why not divide the country?

In John L. Brooks letter to the editor [“Too much power for one county,” Northwest Voices, Nov. 11], he suggests that we divide the state in two sections of liberals and conservatives.

Recently I heard of someone who suggested we do that with the whole country.

Each would have its own supreme court and tax system, and its own infrastructure and school system. But the nice part would be that you would be free to move from one "country" to the other so no one would ever have to be unhappy.

The Washington conservative Eastern farmer could change places with the liberal South Dakota farmer. It could just work!!

– Jean Lichti, Bainbridge Island

Voting by self-interest

I would summarize the results of the 2012 ballot initiatives in this way:

A majority of voters in Washington want to be able to send kids to school wherever they want, to marry whomever they want, and to smoke pot however much they want. And we want to do all of this and more without having to pay for it unless two-thirds of lawmakers agree, which they never want to do.

The lesson from this election? Maybe voting by pure self-interest won’t turn out to be all we’d hoped for. Time will tell.

— Dan Magill, Seattle


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Would also divide the country between the more prosperous and less prosperous sections... MORE
Passage of the Two-Third's Majority referendum was stunningly stupid. cadre ... MORE
Passage of the Two-Third's Majority referendum was stunningly stupid. It was also as... MORE

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon



Advertising