Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

November 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (15)
  • Print

Olerud wins board backing, trees will be cut

Triumph of celebrity over common sense

The Clyde Hill decision to allow John Olerud to force a neighbor to cut down a beloved old pine tree that had been there for years before Olerud built his house is mind-boggling [“Olerud wins board backing to cut trees blocking view,” page one, Nov. 9].

View-preservation laws are designed to prohibit a resident from creating a new obstruction to an existing view, not to provide a mechanism for altering the property of a pre-existing resident to suit the whims of a wealthy new neighbor.

This decision represents the ultimate triumph of celebrity over common sense and simple justice. It should be appealed and reversed.

— Richard Berk, Seattle

Remove the ordinance

Losing your view can be as easy as your neighbor or a developer increasing the size of their building. This loss can happen in less than a year and it's perfectly legal. While none of us like it, we all buy view property knowing that this could happen.

But it seems that trees that may take hundreds of years to grow fully are subject to a different set of laws.The Oleruds succeeded in becoming $255,000 richer and the rest of us lost a little more of nature's beauty. It's time to remove this ordinance.

— Jeffrey W. Waymack, Seattle


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
The Clyde Hill Boards decision is total crap. Olerud should have been told to live with... MORE
Hey folks, consider the source. It's CLYDE HILL. Where "money doesn't talk... MORE
Hooray for being richer than your neighbor... what a tool. MORE

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon



Advertising