Skip to main content
Advertising

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words letters@seattletimes.com.

August 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Coal-train initiative fails to garner enough signatures

Similar to battle over oil tankers

Recently, a court ruled against a voter initiative banning the transport of coal through Bellingham [Anti-coal initiative won’t be on the ballot,” Around the Northwest, Aug. 5]. The Whatcom County initiative would have been advisory only.

The battle against the transport of coal is reminiscent of the battle the state waged against the transport of oil. The state tried to micromanage the oil-tanker traffic. The tanker companies fought back and took the state to court, all the way to the Supreme Court. The state lost, in a ruling known as Intertanko. The ruling stated that the state could not place additional regulations on ships that were regulated by the federal government.

As a reaction to this ruling, the state passed the requirement that the transport of oil meet BAP and BAT standards, which simply means that the oil tankers must use the Best Available Technology and Best Available Practices in the transport of oil.

The same standards should apply to coal. BAP, BAT standards for the proposed coal terminal would include a wind block around the terminal site that would serve not just as protection from sudden wind gusts, but also as noise abatement, as well as covered coal piles and rail cars.

— Donna Shaw, Ferndale


Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon



Advertising