Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published August 17, 2014 at 8:24 PM | Page modified August 17, 2014 at 8:40 PM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments
  • Print

Iraqi Shiites, Sunnis complain U.S. ignoring their plight

They see the United States wading in to protect a favored ally in Iraq’s Kurdish Regional Government, but leaving the rest of Iraq to fend for itself since extremists in the Islamic State displaced hundreds of thousands of other Iraqis.


McClatchy Foreign Staff

Developments

Retaking key dam: Kurdish Iraqi fighters were reported to have taken back much of the Mosul Dam, a huge structure on the Tigris River and a key source of power and water for northern Iraq as the United States stepped up its bombardment of Islamic State fighters.

U.S. airstrikes: The airstrikes have intensified since the resignation last week Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, whom the White House had seen as an impediment to political progress necessary to defeat the Islamic State. On Sunday, Central Command broadened the justification for them, for the first time saying that the United States was “supporting” Iraqi and Kurdish troops on the ground, rather than only to support humanitarian efforts in Iraq and protect critical infrastructure, U.S. personnel and facilities. President Obama informed Congress, consistent with the War Powers Resolution.

Syria airstrikes: Syrian government warplanes pounded an Islamic State group stronghold as well as other towns controlled by the jihadis Sunday, activists said. President Bashar Assad’s air force had rarely targeted territory controlled by the Islamic State until the extremist group made gains in neighboring Iraq.

— Seattle Times news services

The Shiites and Sunnis are complaining although the United States spent nearly $1 trillion trying to rebuild Iraq and... MORE

advertising

BAGHDAD — As U.S. warplanes tilt the battlefield against Islamic extremists in Kurdish-controlled territories, Iraqis in the rest of the country are growing resentful that the United States is not intervening more forcefully to protect Arabs who have been fighting extremists for months.

They see the United States wading in to protect a favored ally in Iraq’s Kurdish Regional Government, but leaving the rest of Iraq to fend for itself since extremists in the Islamic State displaced hundreds of thousands of Shiite Arabs when they seized the city of Mosul in June.

“From the beginning, the Iraqi government has asked America to step in to a dangerous situation for the Shiites,” said Farid al Ibrahimi, a Shiite lawmaker. “When (the Islamic State) tried to attack the Kurdistan region, the movement by the Americans was so, so, so fast.”

The Islamic State is retreating from its advance in the Kurdish north but continues to hold significant territory in the country’s Sunni Arab west and middle.

Other factions in Iraq also are clamoring for more U.S. military assistance.

Some say they want Western forces to drive out the Islamic State because they don’t trust their own military not to inflict excessive collateral damage or to refrain from payback assaults on Sunni Arabs who stayed in territory held by the extremists.

“If America doesn’t help us, we will never go back,” said Bashir Hassan, 59, an Iraqi Turk who has been homeless for nearly two months since the Islamic State attacked his village near the city of Tal Afar.

He’s a Shiite Muslim who no longer trusts his Sunni neighbors since extremists moved into their community, and, he says, helped the Islamic State raid his home.

The extremist group’s high-water mark came Aug. 3, when it set off fears that it could hit the Kurdish capital of Irbil after an assault on the Kurdish city of Sinjar that drove tens of thousands of people into mountain hideouts.

The Kurds control a semiautonomous region in northern Iraq and they have long sought independence. They’ve been close U.S. allies since the Gulf War, when the United States created a no-fly zone that protected them from Saddam Hussein’s military.

On Sunday, U.S. jets hammered Islamic State positions near the Mosul Dam, clearing a path for Iraqi counterterrorism and Kurdish troops to retake a facility that powers Iraq’s second-largest city.

Closer to the capital, Baghdad residents have been bracing for attacks by the Islamic State since the group seized territory in Anbar province in January.

President Obama on Aug. 7 authorized U.S. airstrikes in Iraq to protect U.S. personnel and to support humanitarian measures intended to free members of the Yazidi religious sect who were trapped by the Islamic State after they fled Sinjar.

The order carried an implied agreement to protect Baghdad, which houses America’s largest embassy, but it did not explicitly authorize strikes elsewhere.

Obama told The New York Times that he did not order airstrikes sooner because he wanted to pressure Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s supporters to choose a new leader who might nurture a more inclusive government.

Al-Maliki’s party has since selected lawmaker Haider al-Abadi to follow al-Maliki, opening the door to increased American military support.

U.S. officials have not described what kind of assistance they might offer, or said whether it would include airstrikes south of the Kurdish territory.

Shiites want a more explicit commitment now that they have rejected al-Maliki, as the Americans wanted.

“America is in charge of the defense of Iraq from whatever risk because America was the reason for the destruction of the infrastructure of Iraq and leaving the Iraqi army out of order, so they are obliged to protect Iraq,” said Razzaq al-Hadari, a Shiite lawmaker from the Badr Bloc.

He called the U.S. “somehow lazy” in its reaction to the Islamic State’s first assault on Mosul.

Sunni leaders, likewise, have been calling for more direct intervention from the U.S. military. Jamila al-Obeidi, a Sunni parliament member, wants U.S. assistance because she believes the Iraqi air force has hit too many innocents in its strikes.

Other Sunni tribal leaders have been seeking U.S. assistance to turn back extremists in their communities, an echo of the 2007 “Sunni Awakening” in Anbar Province when tribes worked with the U.S. military to expel al-Qaida fighters.

But some Iraqis are just as adamant that the United States should stay out of Iraq as they were during the American occupation.

“The Americans are our enemies,” said Abu Faroq Jumaili, a former Iraqi army lieutenant colonel during Saddam’s regime. He now leads fighters opposed to the Iraqi government in Anbar province.

He said U.S. bombs would fall on the very Iraqis who are now asking for more aid.

“How did they forget that the Americans hit and bombed their houses? They are not far away from an airstrike that will hit their houses again. We don’t trust the Americans,” he said.



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►