Senator: Why hasn’t GM’s top lawyer been fired?
GM’s general counsel Michael Millikin repeatedly stated that he first learned of the deadly ignition-switch defect the first week of February.
The New York Times
The day in D.C.
Terrorism insurance: The Senate voted to extend through 2021 the U.S. government’s financial backing for insurance to protect companies against losses from acts of terrorism. The bill, passed 93-4 Thursday, now goes to the House, where Republican leaders propose cutting back the reimbursement for attacks involving conventional weapons.
IRS scandal: A Justice Department investigation into the Internal Revenue Service has expanded to include an inquiry into the disappearance of emails from Lois Lerner, a former senior IRS official. The IRS has said it lost the emails in 2011 when Lerner’s computer crashed. Lerner, who refused to answer questions at two House committee hearings, has become a central figure in several congressional investigations into the handling of applications for tax-exempt status by tea-party groups.
Seattle Times news services
WASHINGTON — General Motors’ (GM) top lawyer came under withering attack from senators Thursday at a hearing investigating the automaker’s failure to recall millions of defective cars for more than a decade.
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., chairwoman of the commerce subcommittee on consumer protection, wasted little time before questioning the actions of Michael Millikin, GM’s general counsel.
Noting he had been warned several times of potential liability related to the defective switch, which GM has linked to 13 deaths, McCaskill expressed disbelief that he had not been dismissed.
“I don’t get how you and Lucy Clark Dougherty still have your jobs,” McCaskill said to Millikin, referring to GM’s general counsel for North America. “This is either gross negligence or gross incompetence on the part of a lawyer. The fact that he can say ‘I don’t know.’ ”
McCaskill turned to GM’s chief executive, Mary Barra, who also testified at the hearing, and asked her why he was not among those employees who have been dismissed.
“I respectfully disagree,” Barra said. She added that Millikin is a person of “high integrity” and blamed systemic problems within the legal department. She said there were “very senior lawyers who had this information and didn’t bring it forward who are no longer with the company,” but that she did not intend to dismiss Millikin.
McCaskill said the company’s internal report should have been enough for GM to have already taken that action.
Millikin repeatedly stated that he first learned of the defect the first week of February.
“I wish I had known about it earlier, because I know I would have acted,” he said.
The company’s legal staff fought ignition lawsuits for years despite knowing that company engineers and investigators were aware of safety problems and related accidents. In her opening remarks, McCaskill said: “The culture of lawyering up and Whac-A-Mole” at the Detroit automaker “killed innocent customers of General Motors.”
“The failure of this legal department is stunning,” McCaskill concluded.
Several senators also focused on how forthright GM was in its disclosures with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Referring to a report in The New York Times that GM refused to answer certain death-investigation letters sent by the agency, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said it showed that GM was trying to hide something.
“I consider it a cover-up when a manufacturer does not respond fully and accurately to NHTSA about what it knows about deaths in its vehicles,” she said. “This wasn’t some casual memo.”
Millikin said he did not know about the practice before this week, saying it was “news to me” when he read the report in The Times.
Barra told the panel that GM would not treat such inquiries that way today, which drew a rebuke from the California senator.
“You can’t just say now, now, and forget the past,” Boxer said. “Because people died.”
Before Millikin and Barra testified, compensation expert Kenneth Feinberg told lawmakers that GM had set no limits on what it would pay to people who were injured or killed in cars equipped with defective ignition switches.
In his first appearance before lawmakers since being hired by GM, Feinberg said he was committed to a swift and thorough process to compensate victims.
“We are authorized to pay as much money as is required,” Feinberg testified.
The automaker has said it expects that the number of deaths associated from the switch defect would rise from the 13 it has acknowledged. The switches were prone to turn off, which would cut the engine and disable crucial systems such as power steering and brakes, and the air bags.
Before the hearing, some of the victims’ families held a news conference, many holding pictures of their dead or injured loved ones as they called for GM to be held responsible.
Jay and Gerri Gass of Tennessee, the parents of Lara Gass, who died in March when her Saturn Ion stalled and crashed, wept as they held her picture.
“I haven’t had any good mornings since she passed away,” Jay Gass said.
Gass said what troubled him most was that many of GM’s recalled cars remained on the road. He called them dangerous to occupants and other drivers.
“These cars are on the streets today,” he said. “These are Scud missiles that could go uncontrolled in front of you.”
He said he recently stopped at a gas station and noticed a woman in an Ion, with a mass of keys on her key ring. She hadn’t realized the danger.