Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published May 8, 2014 at 7:53 PM | Page modified May 8, 2014 at 9:43 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

After Gadhafi’s fall, Congress showed little interest in Libya

The new Benghazi probe is unlikely to tackle another topic some argue is just as critical to understanding what went wrong in Libya: Congress’ failure to call attention to the deteriorating security situation after longtime leader Moammar Gadhafi was toppled.


McClatchy Washington Bureau

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
@Thibaud You're wacko. You have no idea what you're talking about. I wouldn't trust a republican with a ten foot... MORE
So, Congress didn't pay enough attention to Libya, including all the Republicans. Using the logic of the morons who... MORE
As I recall there was a bill to spend more money for supporting our embassies and people abroad, but the bill was... MORE

advertising

WASHINGTON — It may be hard to believe now, but there was a time when Congress showed very little interest in Libya.

On Thursday, the House voted along party lines, 232-186, to convene a select committee to investigate the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador, J. Christopher Stevens.

Republicans said panel was necessary for Congress to carry out its oversight role into how the attack happened and whether the Obama administration purposely obscured facts afterward.

But the new Benghazi probe is unlikely to tackle another topic some argue is just as critical to understanding what went wrong in Libya: Congress’ failure to call attention to the deteriorating security situation after the NATO-assisted toppling of Libya’s longtime leader, Moammar Gadhafi.

Even after Congress approved the U.S. military joining a NATO mission in May 2011 whose efforts contributed to Gadhafi’s fall and death, neither the House nor the Senate held a hearing about Libya and what the mission had left behind.

After four decades of living under Gadhafi, Libya struggled to maintain security, its economy failed to recover and the government in Tripoli was powerless to fend off extremists who took control of the country.

Sen. John McCain, of Arizona, the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, met with Stevens during a July 2012 visit to Libya, two months before Stevens’ death.

Yet McCain made no mention publicly of the deteriorating security situation and, instead, issued a news release that effusively praised the progress Libya was making toward democracy.

Asked this week about his visit with Stevens, McCain said the ambassador had discussed the security situation with him. Pressed for details, McCain said he could not remember the specifics.

Asked whether he brought any security concerns to the attention of Congress or officials at the State Department when he returned from Libya, McCain said he could not recall.

A review of Senate records found nothing to indicate that he had.

McCain acknowledged he didn’t probe. “I didn’t ask him questions,” he said.

McCain is not alone. Before the Benghazi attack, Congress showed little interest in developments in Libya after the collapse of the Gadhafi government.

Russia, which had joined the United States in supporting a U.N. resolution authorizing the use of force, later accused the West of exceeding its authority.

The chairman of the new House select committee, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., voted for the resolution that allowed for U.S. intervention in Libya. But he also supported a later one intended to prevent the United States from providing the kind of military presence that some argue was needed to prevent Libya’s decline.

That resolution read in part: “The president has failed to provide Congress with a compelling rationale based upon U.S. national security interests for current U.S. military activities regarding Libya.”



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Career Center Blog

Career Center Blog

How to tame an unruly resume


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►