Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published July 14, 2013 at 9:42 PM | Page modified July 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (12)
  • Print

Zimmerman verdict fails to end national debate

The Justice Department said Sunday it is looking into the shooting death of Trayvon Martin to determine whether federal prosecutors will file criminal civil-rights charges now that George Zimmerman has been acquitted in the Florida state case.

The Washington Post

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
This debate will never be over!!! As long as we continue to fight for our... MORE
I don't know what actually happened. Zimmerman acted stupidly. Paraphrasing a profe... MORE
The prosecutors should have made better use of the 14 recorded screams loud enough to... MORE

advertising

SANFORD, Fla. — It’s over.

But it’s not really done.

The not-guilty verdict that sounded so final, so utterly unequivocal, in Courtroom 5D of the Seminole County courthouse Saturday night has quickly given way to a kaleidoscope of demonstrations across the country, debate about wrongful-death lawsuits and website-crashing demands for the filing of federal civil-rights charges.

On Saturday night, George Zimmerman was able to shed the GPS that had monitored his movements before he was acquitted of manslaughter and second-degree murder charges in the death of teenager Trayvon Martin. But the drama over the case persists, and it promises to go on and on.

Such is the cramped and rolling nature of this spectacle that Attorney General Eric Holder is to speak Tuesday in Orlando, Fla., just a short drive from the courthouse where the verdict was read. He will address the annual convention of an organization — the NAACP — whose leader, Benjamin Jealous, launched a petition late Saturday asking that Holder’s Justice Department file civil-rights charges against Zimmerman. The petition received such a massive response that it crashed the NAACP website.

Within hours of the petition’s debut, the Justice Department released a statement saying its civil-rights division still had an open investigation into Martin’s death, dating back more than a year.

Working with the FBI, federal prosecutors are reviewing evidence gathered during a Justice Department investigation — and revealed during Zimmerman’s trial — to see whether the case fits within “the limited federal criminal civil-rights statutes,” the statement said.

The White House issued a statement in which President Obama characterized Martin’s death as “a tragedy ... not just for his family ... but for America.” The president acknowledged that “passions may be running ever higher” in the wake of the verdict but urged citizens to remember a jury had spoken.

“I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son,” Obama said. “And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities ... if we’re doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence that claims too many lives across this country on a daily basis ... that’s the way to honor Trayvon Martin.”

Zimmerman, who has a white father and a Peruvian mother, claimed self-defense in the death of Martin, an unarmed African-American teenager he saw walking through his modest gated community in February 2012. Zimmerman said he shot Martin after the teenager sucker-punched him and started pounding his head into a concrete walkway. Zimmerman had a concealed-carry permit for the handgun he used that night.

“I think it was racial profiling,” Barbara Arnwine, executive director of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said in an interview Sunday shortly after arriving in the Orlando area.

Arnwine said she had met with Justice Department officials before Zimmerman’s arrest in hopes of persuading them to file civil-rights charges and that she would renew the push now that Zimmerman has been acquitted by a six-woman jury with no African-American members.

However, doubts have been expressed by at least one Martin family attorney about the viability of a civil-rights charge.

In an interview with The Washington Post during the trial, Daryl Parks said: “There was not enough evidence to say that [Zimmerman] made this decision based on race ... On the facts of this case, you can’t say it was based on race.”

In closing arguments and in a news conference after the verdict, prosecutors insisted the trial was not about race. Arnwine criticized prosecutors, including State Attorney Angela Corey, who was appointed by Gov. Rick Scott, R, for taking that approach.

“What did she think it was about?” Arnwine said. “I do think that the case did show that the prosecutors did not have a good strategy for dealing with the racial element of the case,” she said.

Florida defense lawyer Diana Tennis argued in an interview that “if anybody has a civil-rights action, it’s George Zimmerman.”

Tennis said “black leaders and black lawyers got him maliciously prosecuted” by pressuring local politicians during the month and a half between the shooting and Zimmerman’s arrest.

Zimmerman, she said, is “the one who might end up in federal court asking a lot of embarrassing questions to a lot of shamefaced politicians.”

Zimmerman’s attorneys are poised for the possibility of civil lawsuits against their client. Defense attorney Mark O’Mara has said he will seek immunity for Zimmerman if civil suits “spawned by this fiasco” are filed.

Tennis said the defense pursued a pretrial strategy that seemed designed, at least in part, to avoid any risk of not being able to claim immunity in future civil lawsuits.

The defense opted against asking the judge to dismiss the case based on Florida’s “stand your ground” law, which in many cases justifies the use of deadly force, without the obligation to flee, when a person feels threatened.

If the judge had refused a dismissal on those grounds, Zimmerman might not have been able to claim immunity later, Tennis said.

“They took a gambit,” she said. “I think they were looking forward.”

She noted that even though Zimmerman is not wealthy, he may be able to strike lucrative book deals that would generate income that could potentially be at risk in a civil suit.

The legal standard in a civil lawsuit is lower — a preponderance of the evidence, rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Zimmerman chose not to testify in his criminal trial, but it is likely he would have to testify and be deposed in a civil lawsuit, said Daniel Petrocelli, who led the legal team that won $33.5 million in damages in a civil wrongful-death trial against O.J. Simpson after his murder acquittal.

“In that sense, civil trials are a more pure search for the truth,” Petrocelli said in an interview Sunday. He said his deposition of Simpson lasted 14 days and that he received suggestions from around the world — all of which he ignored — about what questions to ask.

Arnwine said she has met frequently with Martin’s family since they began trying to persuade journalists and public officials to press for an arrest of Zimmerman.

She said she expects them to explore “all their options,” including possible civil litigation and a push for a civil-rights charge now that Zimmerman has been acquitted.

The verdict, she said, is likely to spur more people to attend events related to next month’s 50th anniversary of the March on Washington. And she knows what many of them will be wearing: hoodies.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Enter to win!

Enter to win!

Share a photo of your holiday lights display and you may win a $100 Home Depot gift card.

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising

The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►