Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Friday, April 26, 2013 at 7:55 PM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Former Skakel attorney defends handling of trial

The attorney who represented Michael Skakel during his Connecticut murder trial in 2002 took the stand Friday and defended the work he did for the Kennedy cousin, while also saying he still believes Skakel is innocent.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

VERNON, Conn. —

The attorney who represented Michael Skakel during his Connecticut murder trial in 2002 took the stand Friday and defended the work he did for the Kennedy cousin, while also saying he still believes Skakel is innocent.

Skakel is challenging his conviction in Rockville Superior Court on the ground that he was deprived of his constitutional right to effective legal representation.

The 52-year-old nephew of Robert F. Kennedy's widow, Ethel Kennedy, is serving 20 years to life for the 1975 golf club bludgeoning of Martha Moxley when they were 15-year-old neighbors in Greenwich.

Hearst Connecticut Newspapers (http://bit.ly/Y3apei) reported Friday that Michael Sherman defended his work for Skakel 11 years ago and also testified that he believes his former client is innocent.

"Mr. Skakel never admitted to me that he committed this crime and I still have that belief as well," the newspaper said Sherman testified.

On the stand Thursday, Skakel launched a barrage of criticism against Sherman, portraying an overly confident lawyer having fun and basking in the limelight while making fundamental mistakes from poor jury picks to failing to track down key witnesses. Skakel also said Sherman took photos of the trial judge and jury with a pen camera and had him sign an autograph.

But Sherman on Friday denied he photographed the judge and jurors, and he responded to criticism that he failed to thoroughly investigate another possible suspect, saying that it would have been a waste of time because police had already "gone down that road."

When Skalel's lawyer asked Sherman if he had ever joked that "I'm not a lawyer. I just play one on TV," Sherman responded: "Sounds like something I could have done."

But he also insisted: "My allegiance was to Michael Skakel, only, and the rest of the family knew that."

Testimony ended Friday; a ruling is not expected for months.

---

Information from: Connecticut Post, http://www.connpost.com

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►