Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published January 24, 2013 at 5:34 PM | Page modified January 25, 2013 at 11:25 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (20)
  • Print

Protester’s ban from D.C. ignites free-speech debate

Rives Miller Grogan’s decision on Inauguration Day to climb a tree to make his point within sight of the president has united conservatives and liberals in their own protests.

The Washington Post

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
That's the beauty and the beast of the 1st amendment right to free speech. I think... MORE
While I don't share the same views as this man, if the country is going to allow the... MORE
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. ... MORE

advertising

WASHINGTON — A District of Columbia judge’s order barring a tenacious anti-abortion protester from setting foot in the city has touched off a vigorous debate over free speech and political dissent in the nation’s capital.

Rives Miller Grogan’s decision on Inauguration Day to climb a tree to make his point within sight of the president has united conservatives and liberals in their own protests.

“Banning him from the District because he’s sitting in a tree or speaking out, I think is absurd,” said John Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute, a civil-liberties group that is taking up Grogan’s case. “He’s strange, but do you know how many strange people enter D.C. every day who probably shouldn’t be here?”

Magistrate Judge Karen Howze signed the order Tuesday, telling Grogan to stay out of the city until a hearing Feb. 25. The order is more sweeping than what prosecutors had sought. The U.S. Attorney’s Office had asked that Grogan be banned from the Capitol grounds, House and Senate office buildings, the Library of Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court.

But Howze broadened the request as a condition of releasing Grogan from jail until his trial.

Exiling someone from the District of Columbia’s entire 68.3 square miles of roads, waterways and public spaces happens a few times a year but is still described as rare. The breadth of the order surprised First Amendment experts who have litigated or studied similar protest cases for liberal and conservative causes.

“Overbroad”

It is “a pristine example of an overbroad condition,” said David Hudson Jr., a law professor and First Amendment scholar at Vanderbilt University. “They need to go back and draft a more narrowly tailored restriction — meaning something that would comport with the First Amendment.”

Judges are not allowed to talk about pending cases. Howze, through a spokeswoman, cited the restriction in declining to comment.

Grogan, 47, who calls himself “Pastor Rick” and runs a ministry and boardinghouse in Los Angeles, admits he’s an irritant, racking up about 10 arrests and a half-dozen convictions in two years in House and Senate buildings alone.

He said he patiently waits for the proceedings to be recessed before he stands and shouts, most recently in the Senate gallery when he screamed that legal abortions caused the massacre in Newtown, Conn.

“I preach, and I preach loudly on Capitol Hill,” said Grogan, who said he’s never spent more than a few days in jail. He’s been thrown out of a presidential debate, a Major League Baseball game attended by Mitt Romney, and too many buildings to count.

“Most of the time, they arrest me and then they let me go,” he said. But never, he said, had he been tossed from a city. He spoke by telephone from his car as he drove home to California.

“I don’t know why they would ban me from all of Washington,” he said. “I think they are totally suppressing my freedom of speech.”

Grogan said he obtained a ticket for the green section of the inauguration and hid a protest sign under his coat. Once past security, he said, he climbed the tree and began shouting. U.S. Capitol Police officers used a bull horn to urge him down and then tried 35-foot ladders. But Grogan said he climbed higher and managed to stay 10 feet out of reach for five hours, getting a treetop view of President Obama’s swearing-in.

“It was the best seat in the house,” he said.

Grogan climbed down after about five hours, after the ceremony had ended. His charges include violating laws that require authorities to “preserve the peace and secure the Capitol from defacement” and to protect the “public property, turf and grounds from destruction.”

Safety concerns

Howze was not insensitive to Grogan’s free-speech rights but was weighing those against safety issues, according to a transcript of the proceedings. Grogan’s recurring arrests elevated her concerns, the transcript shows.

“While trying to exercise free speech, the more ... these things happen, the more you put yourself in jeopardy because we have to determine if this is a danger to the community,” Howze said in the transcript. She reminded Grogan that he could have been held in jail because of his pending cases, rather than released with the restriction to stay out of Washington.

Grogan, she said, “appears to endanger hundreds of people, disrupting the inauguration throughout.”

The police charging document filed in court accuses Grogan of breaking several tree branches. A spokesman for the Capitol Police said authorities did not deem Grogan a threat to the president. But Grogan, who has at least three pending cases in the District of Columbia, was “jeopardizing his life and the life of others” if the tree branch broke, the arrest report says.

James Felman, a Tampa, Fla., defense attorney and co-chairman of the American Bar Association’s sentencing committee, said that if the tree branch “is your public-safety argument for the stay-out-of-town order, it is really dubious. If the tree branch is your argument, order him not to climb trees over the heads of people.”

The order was stunning because it came as a case was pending — before conviction or resolution, said Arthur Spitzer, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of the Nation’s Capital.

“An order like that arguably could make more sense after the person has been convicted, and I am not saying I would agree with that even then for an entire city,” Spitzer said.

Grogan said he has no plans to violate his ban but was looking forward to the next sanctioned return to Washington: his court hearing next month. He plans to arrive early.

“They can oppress my speech and keep me out of the city,” he said. “But what they can’t do when I am allowed back is to stop me from preaching on the steps of the courthouse.”

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984


Advertising