Originally published December 20, 2011 at 4:45 PM | Page modified December 21, 2011 at 8:37 AM
STRIP Act targets TSA uniform
A new House bill would prevent TSA officers from wearing law-enforcement uniforms and policelike badges and calling themselves officers unless they receive law-enforcement training.
Los Angeles Times
WASHINGTON — The STRIP Act is not some adult show.
It's a new House bill that stands for Stop TSA's Reach In Policy and would prevent Transportation Security Administration officers from wearing law-enforcement uniforms and policelike badges and calling themselves officers unless they receive law-enforcement training.
"Congress has sat idly by as the TSA strip searches 85-year-old grandmothers in New York, pats down 3-year-olds in Chattanooga and checks colostomy bags for explosives in Orlando. Enough is enough!" said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn. "The least we can do is end this impersonation, which is an insult to real cops."
The American Federation of Government Employees said the bill was insulting to the 44,000 TSA workers it represented and did "nothing to add to our national security."
"Every single member of Congress should be supporting federal employees, not trying to demean them," the union's national president, John Gage, said in a statement.
Charlie Leocha, director of the Consumer Travel Alliance, said his advocacy group supported the measure.
"I just think it's important to not present an image to the public which is not true," he said, adding that TSA had gone from "more of a friendly operation ... there to help you" to workers who were "intimidating passengers."
The bill, which has drawn 29 co-sponsors in the few weeks since it was introduced, would prohibit any TSA employee "who has not received federal law enforcement training or is not eligible for federal law enforcement benefits from using the official job title of officer, or wearing a metal badge resembling a police badge or a uniform resembling the uniform of a federal law enforcement officer."
A TSA official said the badge and uniform represent "the professionalism of our employees and the seriousness of our work."
The agency, which changed the name of screeners to officers in 2005, said in a statement:
"TSA's frontline workforce protects the traveling public at airports across the country every day, and every day our officers stop deadly weapons from getting on aircraft. In 2008, as part of the organization's continued efforts to transition the workforce to a cadre of well-trained, professional transportation security officers, TSA introduced uniforms more reflective of the critical nature of their work and of the high standards they uphold."
The turbulence over Blackburn's bill comes as the House on Tuesday approved and sent to President Obama a popular measure that would require TSA to develop an expedited screening system for military personnel and, "to the extent possible," accompanying family members, if the armed-forces member is traveling on orders and in uniform.
The measure was introduced by Rep. Chip Cravaack, R-Minn., a Navy veteran and former commercial airline pilot, after he witnessed military personnel experience lengthy waits, including having to take off their boots and medals, at security checkpoints at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport.
"Our soldiers who are sent off to fight for our country or returning from the battlefield deserve to be treated like VIPs in our airports," Cravaack said at a recent hearing.
The fast-track process will be modeled after other TSA "trusted passenger" programs, according to the bill. The agency this year began experimenting with separate security lines that enable pilots and some prescreened frequent fliers to pass through checkpoints at some airports without removing shoes or taking laptops and liquids out of carry-on bags.
Military travelers would have to show official orders for transportation from a commercial service airport that boards more than 10,000 passengers a year, according to the bill.
Additional information from Bloomberg News









Start the conversation >