The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds |

Nation & World

Our network sites | Advanced

Originally published October 28, 2010 at 7:19 PM | Page modified October 28, 2010 at 9:48 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Cap-and-trade cools House Dems' prospects

"Cap and trade" has become a dirty phrase in much of the nation this election season, and the political storm over global warming's causes and solutions may determine several key races.

Los Angeles Times

Related developments

California governor: Republican candidate Meg Whitman, in an appearance on Fox News, said her former housekeeper Nicky Diaz Santillan should be deported. The illegal immigrant, employed by Whitman for nine years, was fired last year when the woman disclosed her immigration status.

California Senate: Republican challenger Carly Fiorina, hospitalized two days for treatment of an infection related to breast-cancer surgery last year, said Thursday she is "completely cancer-free" and feels "fantastic."

Arizona governor: A police report obtained by The Arizona Republic says Gov. Jan Brewer was involved in a 1988 car crash when she was a state senator. Brewer failed sobriety tests and was handcuffed and taken to a police station, but no blood-alcohol test was performed. Arresting officers said she was released because of her status as a lawmaker.

Kentucky Senate: Democrats are replaying the high-profile scuffle involving Rand Paul supporters and a liberal activist in a TV ad that claims the Republican candidate is "stomping on Kentucky."

Rhode Island governor: Democratic candidate Frank Caprio fell from first place to third in the first poll since saying President Obama could "shove it" for not endorsing him.

Alaska Senate: The state Supreme Court late Wednesday blocked a lower court's order and ruled that voters at polling places may see a list of write-in candidates, good news for incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Anchorage Superior Court Judge Frank Pfiffner had ruled against the lists earlier.

Seattle Times news services

Interactive | Climate change



Congressional Republican candidate Robert Hurt barely had begun his opening statement in a debate last week when he accused his opponent of endorsing "job-killing cap and trade."

Hurt, a state senator, repeated the charge five times, insisting each time that Democratic incumbent Rep. Tom Perriello's vote last year for a House energy and climate-change bill would cost the state 50,000 jobs.

The charges have potency far beyond this fiercely contested swath of central and southern Virginia. "Cap and trade" has become a dirty phrase in much of the nation this election season, and the political storm over global warming's causes and solutions may determine several key races.

For the first time in nearly a decade, no Senate Republican candidate supports proposals to limit carbon emissions and trade pollution rights. Most openly question global-warming science or denounce it as a hoax. (Rep. Mark Kirk, running for President Obama's old Senate seat in Illinois, voted for the House bill but now says he would oppose it.)

In some races, especially in coal-producing, farm and factory states in the mid-Atlantic and Midwest, partisan rivals appear united in their condemnation of major climate-change legislation.

At an Oct. 18 debate in Morgantown, W.Va., Gov. Joe Manchin, the Senate Democratic nominee, said Obama was "dead wrong on cap and trade" and that it would ruin the economy. His GOP opponent, John Raese, called global warming a myth.

Even Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who introduced the first Senate cap-and-trade bill in 2003 and vowed during his 2008 presidential run to make it a priority if elected, has joined the skeptics' ranks. "I think it's an inexact science," he told a voters' forum in New Hampshire.

Polls suggest several House races may turn on whether the incumbent voted for the cap-and-trade bill that narrowly passed the chamber in June 2009. A similar measure stalled in the Senate amid intense bickering and appears doomed.

Heather Taylor-Miesle, director of Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund, which supports climate-change legislation, said her group's polling of 23 closely contested districts indicated voters were more likely to back Democratic lawmakers who voted for the bill and stood by it.

"With so many races so close," she said, "it could have a significant effect on the outcome of the election."

But Jon McHenry, a Republican pollster who has surveyed 31 House races for the American Action Forum, a conservative-leaning policy institute, said his data indicated the opposite.

"I'd be surprised if there are any Republicans willing to say they support cap-and-trade now," he said. "Where a Democrat is in a competitive race, it's a clear advantage for the Republicans to campaign against it."

Advocates say a market-based system would help create "green" jobs, spur investment in alternative-energy sources and reduce reliance on foreign oil. Opponents argue it would stunt the economy, increase energy costs and do little to cool the climate.

For now, the battle over climate change appears to have put Democrats on the defensive.

In North Dakota, an energy-producing state, Rep. Earl Pomeroy has been forced to explain why Democrats had a vote on the cap-and-trade bill at all, even as he has made clear his opposition to the legislation.

Speaking to a coal-industry group this month, Pomeroy, a moderate first elected in 1992, said the vote was Nancy Pelosi's "biggest mistake as speaker — and she's made a lot of them."

In Virginia's coal-rich 9th Congressional District, 14-term Democratic Rep. Rick Boucher has been pounded for his climate-change vote. He sits on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, where the bill originated.

"If you can point to one reason that Rich Boucher is in trouble, it's the cap-and-trade vote," said Isaac Wood, who studies House races at the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "People say he's demonizing coal and threatening their jobs."

Boucher, who remains a slim favorite, said he helped negotiate provisions "to get the best deal for coal" in the legislation. The final bill included tens of millions of dollars for "clean coal" technology, funds that would have benefited the region directly.

"I've had to explain it," he said. "It's not easy to explain. It does not translate very well into a 30-second commercial."

In adjoining District 5, Perriello has tried to turn the argument to one about clean energy and jobs. Trailing in polls all year, the freshman Democrat has trumpeted his efforts to funnel federal funds to renewable-energy projects in the economically depressed region.

"I think my message of energy independence and green jobs still beats the Republican message of burying your head in the sand and doing nothing, even in a very conservative district," Perriello said.

But even some of his supporters are skeptical.

Roy VanDerHyde, who runs a dairy in Chatham, received about $1.2 million in state and federal grants this year to harness methane produced from cow manure. His herd in another month will provide enough electricity to power as much as 600 homes, he said.

"I'm split on cap-and-trade," VanDerHyde said. "If it works, it could make my [project] a gold mine. But it will cost so much to run the dairy, it will be a wash. That's what I'm worried about."

James Oliphant of the Tribune Washington Bureau contributed

to this report.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Nation & World

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

More Nation & World headlines...

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

No comments have been posted to this article.

Get home delivery today!



AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech