Originally published October 25, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified October 25, 2007 at 2:01 AM
Big Apple still seeks calorie counts on fast-food menus
Burger joints, beware: New York's calorie crusaders are at it again. City health officials announced Wednesday that they hope to revive...
The Associated Press
NEW YORK — Burger joints, beware: New York's calorie crusaders are at it again.
City health officials announced Wednesday that they hope to revive their stalled plan to force fast-food chains to add calorie counts to the big menu boards that hang above their counters.
The city's original effort to put calories on menus was struck down by a judge in September, but Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden said the regulation has been reworked and is ready for a second try.
"People deserve to have more information when they are ordering food," he said.
Like the previous regulation, the new version presented to the Board of Health on Wednesday would require restaurants like McDonald's, Burger King and Taco Bell to list a calorie count for each menu item as prominently as the price.
City officials have argued that action is needed to address an obesity epidemic in the city, which they blame partly on more residents relying on fast food for many of their regular meals.
The idea, Frieden said, is to make people think twice about ordering a 1,000-calorie lunch, which for many people is about half the recommended daily total of calories.
Health officials believe that New York City was the first place in the U.S. to enact a regulation requiring some restaurants to put calorie information on menus.
Since then, other cities and states have considered similar rules. California lawmakers passed a bill similar to New York's regulation, but it was vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger earlier this month.
In Washington, the King County Board of Health in July enacted a rule requiring menus at fast-food restaurants to include nutrition labeling beginning Aug. 1, 2008. It affects restaurants in a chain with 10 or more outlets nationally.
In New York, the new policy would apply only to chains with 15 or more stores, and then only restaurants serving standardized portion sizes that can easily be measured for calorie content.
Restaurants are certain to sue for a second time over the plan.
![]()
Fast-food companies have argued that the calorie data will clutter menus and irritate customers, who don't necessarily want to be confronted with health data.
In their first lawsuit, restaurants also argued that the health department doesn't have the authority to impose such a rule.
A federal judge agreed, to some extent. U.S. District Judge Richard J. Howell said the initial rule conflicted with federal food-labeling laws. But he also suggested that a few adjustments could resolve those legal hurdles.
The revised rule contains one major change: Initially, the policy applied only to restaurants that had already decided to offer nutritional information voluntarily to customers.
Most fast-food giants have made nutritional information available on posters or Web sites for years, and the city argued that it would be easy for them to provide some of the same information on their menus.
This time, restaurants would be required to post calorie information whether they had done so previously or not.
Information from The Seattle Times archives is included in this report.
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port
UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya
UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes
Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates
Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

(Courtesy of LeMay — America's Car Museum) New LeMay exhibit to look at NASCAR LeMay — America's Car Museum in Tacoma will look at the wil...
Post a comment
- Amazon’s plan for giant spheres gets mixed reaction
- No question: Russell Wilson's in charge now
- Pete Carroll on Seahawks' off-field problems: "It's real serious"
- Records: Slain intruder showed signs of mental breakdown
- Police: Brother-in-law ‘heavily involved’ in disposal of Susan Powell’s body
- Man shot to death while questioned in Boston probe
- Ex-Great Wolf Lodge lifeguard charged with rape of guest, 14
- Burt Bacharach opens up on daughter's suicide
- Is Catholic Church taking over health care in Washington? | Danny Westneat
- UW Medicine, Catholic health system to have ‘strategic affiliation’
- Is Catholic Church taking over health care in Washington?
289 - Official: Treasury played no role in IRS targeting
235 - Game thread: Mariners try to end trip with a win
218 - Podcast: Mariners season hits crucial point
141 - Mariners head home facing key decisions as losing streak hits six
125 - Businesses refuse service to gays
118 - Mariners shuffle lineup, put Bay at leadoff and Morse at No. 3
84 - View from Sacramento: David Stern deserves statue, thanks
80 - GOP questions IRS scrutiny of anti-abortion groups
67 - Police: 1 dead, 2 injured in attack in London
64
- UW Medicine, Catholic health system to have ‘strategic affiliation’
- Is Catholic Church taking over health care in Washington? | Danny Westneat
- Amazon’s plan for giant spheres gets mixed reaction
- Kemper Freeman plans $1.2 billion expansion in Bellevue
- UW expands online courses, this time from Harvard, MIT
- Catholic schools update to compete with charter schools
- China’s wealthy paying cash for Eastside luxury homes
- Italy on the plate by way of Ballard | Taste
- deafReview gives a voice to deaf consumers
- Earthquake scenarios show potential for huge damage, loss of life










