advertising
Link to jump to start of content The Seattle Times Company Jobs Autos Homes Rentals NWsource Classifieds seattletimes.com
The Seattle Times Nation & World
Traffic | Weather | Your account Movies | Restaurants | Today's events

Friday, July 14, 2006 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

Print

Bush says court can review surveillance

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — Switching course on one of his most controversial anti-terrorism policies, President Bush agreed Thursday to submit the administration's warrantless-surveillance program to a court for constitutional review.

A deal negotiated between the White House and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., came with conditions. Bush is insisting that Congress first give him new leeway in some areas of surveillance and that all lawsuits challenging his eavesdropping policy be funneled to a Washington-based intelligence court that operates in secret.

Even so, the accord is a reversal of Bush's position that he would not submit his program to court review. The administration has contended that the executive branch already has the wartime authority it needs to order the National Security Agency to monitor e-mails and telephone calls between the United States and foreign countries when at least one party is suspected of terrorist ties.

Specter has disputed that assertion, and many Democrats and civil-liberties groups responded with outrage after the surveillance program was disclosed in news accounts last winter.

Bush agreed voluntarily to submit his program to the court named for the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), contingent on Congress passing legislation drafted by Specter and administration lawyers.

The legislation would allow the Justice Department unlimited attempts to revise the program to meet the court's approval and would allow it to appeal adverse court rulings. It also would allow the government to send to the FISA court all lawsuits challenging the program's legality that are pending in federal courts.

Thursday's agreement is the latest in a series of concessions Bush has made in his hard-line anti-terrorism tactics in recent days. On Tuesday, the administration agreed to apply key provisions of the Geneva Conventions to all terrorism suspects in U.S. military custody, bowing to the Supreme Court's rejection of its policies involving the treatment of detainees.

Although the deal with Specter represented a retreat by Bush, White House aides traveling with him in Germany put an upbeat face on the move.

"The bill recognizes the president's constitutional authority and modernizes FISA to meet the threats we face from an enemy that kills with abandon and hides as they plot attacks," spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

But Specter, briefing reporters at the Capitol, said his bill would recognize the president's constitutional powers only in general terms and would make clear the administration must defer to judicial restraints.

advertising
"Unless the court finds it's constitutional," he said of the warrantless-eavesdropping program, "it cannot function."

Specter said it is unclear whether a FISA court decision will be made public.

Several Democrats denounced the bill. "The Specter bill is an end-run around the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and provides the president a blank check to conduct warrantless surveillance of Americans," said Rep. Jane Harman of California, ranking Democrat on the House intelligence panel.

The FISA court is composed of seven federal district judges appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Congress established it to authorize secret surveillance of espionage and terrorism suspects within the United States. The 1978 law required the Justice Department to show probable cause for targeting people. But after the 2001 terrorist attacks, Bush said warrantless wiretaps were justified in the name of national security.

Some civil libertarians fear Specter's approach invites FISA to give broad approval to surveillance efforts on an unknown number of Americans, when the original law presumed that there would be a case-by-case review.

Specter said his intent was to get a "determination on constitutionality of the overall program."

Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company

Marketplace

advertising

advertising

More shopping