Skip to main content

Originally published April 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM | Page modified April 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM

  • Share:
  • Comments (2)
  • Print

Corrected version

Roger Ebert: Movies brought him fame; writing let him believe ‘all is well’

It would not be a stretch to say that Roger Ebert was the best-known film reviewer of his generation, and one of the most trusted.

The New York Times

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Times Editor - You have a slight typo in the headline. MORE
It's pretty sad that a story about a newspaper man has such an egregious typo in bold... MORE


Roger Ebert, the popular film critic and television co-host who along with his fellow reviewer Gene Siskel could lift or sink the fortunes of a movie with their trademark thumbs up or thumbs down, died Thursday in Chicago. He was 70.

His death was announced by the Chicago Sun-Times, where he had worked for more than 40 years. He had suffered from cancer and related health problems since 2002. He died at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago as he was getting ready to go home for hospice care, his wife said in a statement posted on his blog Thursday. Two days earlier, he had announced he was undergoing radiation treatment for a recurrence of cancer.

“So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I’ll see you at the movies,” Mr. Ebert wrote Tuesday.

It would not be a stretch to say that Mr. Ebert was the best-known film reviewer of his generation, and one of the most trusted. The force and grace of his opinions propelled film criticism into the mainstream of U.S. culture. Not only did he advise moviegoers about what to see but also how to think about what they saw.

President Obama said: “For a generation of Americans — especially Chicagoans — Roger was the movies. When he didn’t like a film, he was honest; when he did, he was effusive — capturing the unique power of the movies to take us somewhere magical.”

Mr. Ebert’s struggle with cancer gave him a different public image: as someone who refused to surrender to illness. Although he had operations for cancer of the thyroid, salivary glands and chin, lost his ability to eat, drink and speak (a prosthesis partly obscured the loss of much of his jaw, and he was fed through a tube for years) and became a gaunter version of his once-portly self, he continued to write reviews and commentary and published a cookbook on meals that could be made with a rice cooker.

“When I am writing, my problems become invisible, and I am the same person I always was,” he told Esquire magazine in 2010. “All is well. I am as I should be.”

In recent years, Mr. Ebert became a prolific presence on Facebook and Twitter, on which he had more than 800,000 followers, and was a blogger.

He fired tweets with machine-gun rapidity, on topics profound and prosaic. He commented on pro football, his captions for The New Yorker cartoon contest (he won in 2011), an old pub he once frequented, James Joyce short stories and untold numbers of movies and television shows, to which he linked.

He swore he would not become addicted to Twitter but did. But Mr. Ebert — whose handle was @ebertchicago — never tweeted during a movie.

An odd pairing

Mr. Ebert liked to say his approach — dryly witty, occasionally sarcastic, sometimes quirky — reflected the working newspaper reporter he had been, not a formal student of film. His tastes ran from the classics to boldly independent cinema to cartoons, and his put-downs could be withering.

“I will one day be thin, but Vincent Gallo will always be the director of ‘The Brown Bunny,’” he wrote of a movie he loathed before it was re-edited.

His thumbs-up-or-down approach drew scorn from some critics, who said it trivialized film criticism. Speaking to Playboy magazine in 1991, Mr. Ebert agreed his television program at the time was “not a high-level, in-depth film-criticism show.” But he argued that it demonstrated to younger viewers that one can bring standards of judgment to movies, that “it’s OK to have an opinion.”

In 1975 he became the first film critic to win a Pulitzer Prize, for his Sun-Times reviews. His columns were syndicated to more than 200 newspapers in the United States and abroad, and he wrote more than 15 books, many by skillfully recycling his columns. In 2005 he became the first film critic to be honored with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

With Siskel, Mr. Ebert popularized television film criticism. Their collaboration began in 1975. Mr. Ebert was asked to appear on WTTW, the public broadcasting station in Chicago, as co-host of a new movie-review program. He was taken aback when told Siskel, the film critic of the Chicago Tribune, would be his partner.

“The answer was at the tip of my tongue: No,” Mr. Ebert told Time magazine in 1987.

As for Siskel, he said he initially had no desire to team up with “the most hated guy in my life.”

But the pairing worked. The show, originally titled “Opening Soon at a Theater Near You,” was a public-television hit. It evolved into “Sneak Previews,” which went national when the Public Broadcasting Service began carrying it in 1978. Tribune Entertainment acquired the show in 1982 and syndicated it. In 1986 Mr. Ebert and Siskel signed a contract with Buena Vista Television to syndicate the program as “Siskel & Ebert & the Movies.”

Most people knew the two as intellectually engaged, sweater-wearing, often contentious men sitting in cozy theater chairs ad-libbing about a film’s strengths and weaknesses. Mr. Ebert was the larger one with the owlish eyeglasses, Siskel the taller one who was losing his hair.

For all their combativeness, however, they agreed on a movie’s worth much more often than they differed. “We liked each other; we even loved each other,” Mr. Ebert told Television Week in 2005. “And we also had days when we hated each other.”

Siskel died of a brain tumor in 1999 at 53. Afterward, the show was renamed “Roger Ebert & the Movies” and began rotating co-hosts. In September 2000, Richard Roeper, a fellow Sun-Times columnist, became the permanent co-host and the show was renamed “Ebert & Roeper.” Mr. Ebert left the show in 2006 because of his illness, and Roeper left in 2008.

Mr. Ebert believed a great film should seem new at every watching; he said he had seen “Citizen Kane,” his favorite, scores of times. His credo in judging a film’s value was simple: “Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions never lie to you.”

Lifelong journalist

Roger Joseph Ebert, an only child, was born on June 18, 1942, in Urbana, Ill., to Walter Ebert and the former Annabel Stumm. The first movie he saw was the 1937 Marx Brothers comedy, “A Day at the Races,” in Urbana.

“It was part of a double feature shown with five cartoons, and you got 4 ½ hours of solid entertainment for exactly nine cents,” he once recalled.

He was barely old enough to write when he started his journalistic career, publishing The Washington Street News in his basement and delivering copies to a dozen neighborhood houses. He worked at his grade-school newspaper, edited his high-school paper and by age 15 was earning 75 cents an hour covering high-school sports for The News-Gazette in Champaign, Ill.

In 1964 Mr. Ebert graduated as a journalism major from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, where he was editor of The Daily Illini. He also served as president of the U.S. Student Press Association.

He did graduate study in English at the University of Cape Town under a Rotary International Fellowship. He then became a doctoral candidate in English at the University of Chicago but left to become a feature writer at the Sun-Times.

He was named the paper’s first movie critic in 1967, when he was 24; newspapers at the time wanted young film critics to speak to the young audiences being attracted to movies such as “The Graduate” and “Bonnie and Clyde” as well as films by directors of the French New Wave, including François Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard.

Mr. Ebert got some firsthand moviemaking experience by writing the screenplay for the 1970 movie “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls” for Russ Meyer, a director known for his campy B-movies featuring busty women. Panned by fellow critics (“gratuitously violent,” Siskel said), the film seemed a point of pride for Mr. Ebert, who was paid $15,000 and never tired of talking about it. He wrote a half-dozen more screenplays for Meyer.

As a critic, he quickly gained traction. In 1970 Time magazine called him “a cultural resource of the community.” In 1973 the Chicago Newspaper Guild cited him as “ushering in a new era of criticism in Chicago.”

He revived his TV career in January 2011 with a new film-review program on public television. Using a computer-generated facsimile of his voice, he discussed classic, overlooked and new films while co-hosts handled the “thumbs” judgments.

Mr. Ebert’s books included the “Great Movies” essay collections, a memoir, “Life Itself,” and a book of reviews, “I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie.” He also wrote a book about being a pedestrian in his favorite city: “The Perfect London Walk.”

In July 1992, he married trial attorney Chaz Hammelsmith, who survives him.

Mr. Ebert — who said he saw 500 films a year and reviewed half of them — was once asked what movie he thought was shown over and over again in heaven, and what snack would be free of charge and calories there. “ ‘Citizen Kane’ and vanilla Häagen-Dazs ice cream,” he answered.

Material from The Associated Press is included in this report.

Information in this article, originally published April 5, 2013, was corrected April 6, 2013. A previous headline incorrectly spelled Roger Ebert’s name.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►