Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published August 15, 2014 at 7:40 PM | Page modified August 15, 2014 at 8:17 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments
  • Print

Judge: Seattle voters must choose between preschool measures

Supporters of a union-backed initiative seeking better pay for child-care workers lost their bid Friday in King County Superior Court to keep their measure separate from the city’s preschool plan on the November ballot.


Seattle Times education reporter

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
This should be a rather elementary decision for Seattle voters to choose from. Hopefully Seattle doesn't price... MORE
Another scheme to gouge taxpayers? MORE
another scheme to make someone else pay for what should be the parents responsibility, they were the ones to hit the... MORE

advertising

Seattle voters will have to choose between two measures on the November ballot that would affect the care and education of the city’s preschool-age children, a King County Superior Court judge ruled Friday.

Judge Helen Halpert decided that Initiative 107, which seeks better wages and training for child-care workers, and a $58 million property-tax levy proposed by the City of Seattle for its preschool plan, both address the same subject.

Both sides argued their case in court Friday morning.

Halpert said a quick decision was required to allow time for an appeal before the Sept. 5 deadline to submit the final form of the ballot to the printer.

Under state law, when there are two alternative measures on the same subject, voters must answer two questions on the ballot.

First they have to decide whether either alternative should pass.

Then, no matter how they vote on the first question, they must choose between the alternatives.

The ruling marks a defeat for the two unions backing I-107: Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 925 and the American Federation of Teachers-Washington (AFT), which sued the city last month, hoping to give voters the chance to weigh in on each measure separately and possibly approve both.

The two unions, which together represent about 1,500 of the city’s 4,500 child-care workers, lobbied city leaders for months to include in their plan better pay and training opportunities for all child-care workers in a variety of settings — not just at the centers the city determines to be high quality.

When the two sides couldn’t reach an agreement, the unions spearheaded a coalition called Yes for Early Success, which collected more than 30,000 signatures to put I-107 on the ballot.

The City Council put both proposals on the ballot, but also took a position against I-107 and voted to consider I-107 as a competing, rather than complementary, measure to the levy request.

The unions also accused the City Council of discussing and carrying out legislative duties related to I-107 in closed-door sessions that violated open-meetings laws.

Halpert declined to rule specifically on whether there was a violation, but noted that the subsequent discussion and vote that took place in open session “cured any violation.”

The Yes for Early Success Coalition is considering whether to appeal.

Seattle Mayor Ed Murray and City Council President Tim Burgess have led the city’s yearlong effort to create a narrowly tailored, high-quality preschool plan for 3- and 4-year-olds attending programs that received high-quality ratings from the state.

Lead teachers would be required to have, or be working toward, a bachelor’s degree in early-childhood education. They would be paid on par with kindergarten teachers in Seattle Public Schools.

The city’s measure would fund voluntary preschool for 2,000 children ages 3 and 4 in 100 classrooms by 2018.

I-107, on the other hand, would set city policy on how much parents should pay for child care (no more than 10 percent of family income) and how much child-care workers should earn ($15 an hour), but it doesn’t specify how the city would pay for that policy.

It would also require child-care teachers and staff members to obtain training and certification through a center jointly operated by the city and a provider hired by the city.

The initiative doesn’t say the provider must be a union, but to qualify, the provider must have existed more than five years and have successfully negotiated a contract for child-care workers that increased wages and benefits.

Halpert ruled that while the two approaches have their differences, they address the same subject of improving early childhood education, boosting pay and training for teachers and making preschool more affordable for parents.

John Higgins: 206-464-3145 or jhiggins@seattletimes.com On Twitter @jhigginsST



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

Also in Local News

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Seattle Sketcher Book

Seattle Sketcher Book

Due to popular demand, the pre-sale price of $29.95 is extended until October 5!

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►