Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published April 18, 2014 at 5:46 PM | Page modified April 21, 2014 at 5:00 PM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Corrected version

Nurse-visit program for families faces uncertain funding

A federal program authorized by the 2010 Affordable Care Act sends nurses, social workers and others into homes where outside help might improve a child’s future. The expiration of the nurse-visit program has been looming at the end of the current fiscal year in September.


Seattle Times Washington bureau

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
Five kids? Must not be paying attention to the Democrat platform. Ms. Sanger is sad in her grave. From article:... MORE
Sob story aside, young low-income women, single or not, have no business bearing children they cannot afford to raise. ... MORE
@Big_Buck Personal responsibility kicks in when goverment "free" stuff becomes less abundant or runs out because the... MORE

advertising

WASHINGTON — If parents are their children’s first and best teachers, the role has sometimes left Anna Powell feeling overwhelmed.

Powell also has a 4-year-old daughter who has a learning disability, the same handicap Powell wrestled with as a girl. In December, Powell’s marriage officially ended, a month after the birth of her fifth child.

Into this tumult walked Earlean Hicks. Every other week for the past year, Hicks, a parent educator with the Children’s Home Society of Washington, has come to Powell’s home to listen, guide and help her bear the particular demands of her motherhood.

“When you have so many different kids that have so many different needs, things slip,” said Powell, 31. “Earlean helps you understand these are things you go through and that life has a lot of curveballs.”

Hicks’ visits are paid for in part by the federal Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting program. As part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, Congress authorized $1.5 billion over five years to send nurses, social workers and others into homes where outside help might improve a child’s future. Oftentimes, that means working with young, single, low-income mothers.

Supporters, chief among them Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, believe the visits pay long-term dividends by better preparing children for school and life. But budget feuds between Republicans and Democrats have left Congress little time to deliberate on the merits and design of such programs.

Recently, with the expiration of the nurse-visit program looming at the end of the current fiscal year in September, Murray secured a six-month, $200 million extension by asking Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to attach it to an unrelated Medicare physician-reimbursement bill.

Murray, who during the mid-1980s taught at Crystal Springs Preschool in Bothell and at a Shoreline Community College co-op program for parents and educators, often says she’s seen the value of early childhood support up close.

Research on the effectiveness of home visits are promising, if not conclusive. Programs in New York and Alaska, for instance, helped parents reduce serious physical abuse or improved children’s behavior. A randomized experiment with nearly 200 families in Arizona found that parents who received home visits were much less likely to slap or throw things at a child. But the 2011 study found no significant differences in other measures, including how frequently mothers read to children.

That lack of robust evidence about how well the visits work was a focus of a hearing of the Human Resources Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee earlier this month chaired by Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Auburn.

Reichert, who as a teen ran away from home from an abusive father, noted such programs can benefit kids who got a rough start in life.

“I know if we put the money up front, we can be saving a lot of money in the back end,” Reichert, a former King County sheriff, told witnesses.

However, it’s critical, Reichert said, that taxpayer money go only to evidence-based approaches with proven outcomes. And he wondered how much of the tab for state programs should be picked up by the federal government.

Law-enforcement officials are among the home-visit programs’ biggest supporters. John Urquhart, the present King County sheriff, said it’s “intuitive” that early intervention will help families thrive and keep kids in school longer.

“It’s an investment worth making,” he said.

Federal support for home-visit programs began as a pilot effort in 2007 under President George W. Bush. Murray and other lawmakers helped turn it into a nationwide program in 2010. In addition to the share every state gets, Washington is one of 10 states that has received competitive grants to expand the visits. In fiscal 2013, federal support to the state totaled $10.4 million.

That money is given to two dozen organizations — from Public Health — Seattle & King County to Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association — that follow specific models for the visits.

Powell, the Kent mother, said her parents and her former mother-in-law live nearby and help as they can. Still, she said, she treasures Hicks’ nonjudgmental advice.

Hicks, a mother of six herself, stays for an hour or two during her visits. She checks in on Powell’s youngest, the 5-month-old boy who is her official client. But Powell says Hicks is attentive as well to the older children.

Hicks serves 19 families in South King County. She counsels parents about baby and toddler development; encourages reading and conversation; delivers diapers, formula, day-old bread and other donated goods; and generally helps families hold themselves together.

Hicks called Powell an “awesome mother” who channels her energies into her children.

For her part, Powell said encouragement she gets from Hicks helps her forge on by “giving you days when you feel like you’re doing your best.”

Kyung Song: 202-383-6108 or ksong@seattletimes.com.

Twitter: @KyungMSongG

Information in this article, originally published April 18, 2014, was corrected April 21, 2014. A previous version of this story misidentified the father of Anna Powell’s youngest child. The father is Powell’s boyfriend, not her ex husband. The story also gave an incorrect name for the agency that administers the visiting program. It’s the Children’s Home Society of Washington.



Free 4-week trial, then $99 a year for unlimited seattletimes.com access. Try it now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Free 4-week trial, then $99 a year.

Free 4-week trial, then $99 a year.

Unlimited seattletimes.com access. Try it now.

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising

Career Center Blog

Career Center Blog

Looking for joy on the job


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►