Skip to main content

Originally published Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 7:54 PM

  • Share:
  • Comments (6)
  • Print

Changes proposed in bill upset medical-marijuana advocates

Supporters of the state’s medical-marijuana system crowded a public hearing on Wednesday to decry the measure, which would restrict the amount of pot and number of plants a patient may have.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
This bill essentially says that our government has never believed in medical marijuana... MORE
Why can't those Olympia politicians just leave those medical marijuana people alone. ... MORE
Write your state senator and Representative and tell them to reject HB 2149. The... MORE


OLYMPIA — Supporters of the medical-marijuana system in Washington crowded a public hearing Wednesday to decry a proposal to change it.

The Health Care & Wellness Committee held its first hearing on a measure seeking to overhaul the state’s medical-marijuana system in order to reconcile it with the new, legal recreational market.

The changes under the bill sponsored by Rep. Eileen Cody, D-West Seattle, include reducing the amount of marijuana and number of plants that patients can possess; doing away with collective gardens; and establishing a patient registry.

Lawmakers have worried that the largely unregulated medical system would undercut the taxed, recreational industry. Meanwhile, U.S. Justice Department officials have warned that the state’s medical-pot status quo is untenable.

“Neither one can move forward if we don’t get regulated,” said Cody, the committee chairwoman, after the hearing.

She said she was confident the measure had enough support to advance and that House and Senate members are working together on the issue. “I think something will move,” she said of the bill’s chances for approval.

The state has allowed medical use of marijuana since 1998, and the passage of Initiative 502 last year allowed the sale of the drug to adults for recreational use at licensed stores, which are expected to open by this summer.

But several medical-marijuana advocates say the changes will affect their access unfairly.

Ryan Day, of Thurston County, told lawmakers his 5-year-old son has intractable epilepsy and was having more than 100 seizures a day until he started taking an extracted liquid form of medical marijuana.

Day said he wants to grow the plants his son needs at home but that the bill is too limiting and wouldn’t allow him to do so. “Under the current proposal, we wouldn’t be able to provide the medicine my son needs,” he said.

Day said extracts require more plants than the proposed law allows. And to purchase the medicine from an authorized store would cost him more than $15,000 a year.

“If this bill goes through, you’re going to put me and my family in the impossible situation of treating our son and becoming criminals,” he said. “We are good taxpaying, law-abiding citizens who just want to help our son.”

In December, the state’s Liquor Control Board gave its final recommendations to the Legislature about how it believes the medical system can be brought under the umbrella of Initiative 502.

It suggested allowing licensed I-502 stores to sell medical cannabis, which would be subject to the same high excise taxes as recreational pot. However, patients who sign up for a proposed mandatory state registry of medical-marijuana users would be exempt from sales taxes. The board called for patients to be allowed to grow six plants. Under current regulations, they can grow 15.

The board also suggested eliminating collective gardens and reducing how much pot patients can have from 24 ounces to 3 ounces — which is still more than the 1 ounce adults are allowed under the recreational law.

A separate bill being heard by the House Finance Committee would create a sales-and-use tax exemption for qualified patients who purchase marijuana or marijuana-infused products for medical use from authorized retail outlets licensed by the Liquor Control Board.

Cody’s bill doesn’t address the taxing structure but does integrate the suggestions on reduced number of plants and the number of ounces possessed by a patient, as well as the elimination of collective gardens. However, her bill also eliminates the ability for patients to grow their own cannabis after July 1, 2020, which one Republican lawmaker on the panel questioned.

“At this point you would be establishing a Liquor Control Board monopoly after 2020,” said Rep. Matt Manweller, of Ellensburg, a response met with applause by supporters of medical marijuana in the crowd.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Meet the winemakers

Meet the winemakers

View video interviews, conducted by The Seattle Times wine writer Andy Perdue, profiling five of our state's top winemakers.


Partner Video


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►