Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Tuesday, December 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (95)
  • Print

GET this, UW president: Tuition program is no Ponzi scheme

Is it helpful that the UW president is going around calling the state’s college-savings plan “a Ponzi scheme”? Well, it sure isn’t accurate.


Seattle Times staff columnist

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
UW president maybe wants to decouple GET from UW tuition rates? Why else would he say... MORE
As these things go, it's far better than Social Security. With GET you have the... MORE
This is terribly disingenuous of the UW President. GET is a safe long-term investment... MORE

advertising

Last winter, when Senate Majority Leader Rodney Tom called the state’s modest college-savings program “a Ponzi scheme,” I let it pass. Because ... well, he’s an elected politician. I expect some level of demagoguery from them.

But now another has stepped up to this same bombastic mike, and it’s a surprising one: the president of the University of Washington, Michael Young.

Last week, during an interview Young did with The Atlantic magazine in front of 70 onlookers at a Seattle hotel, he affably called the 15-year-old GET program — in which 150,000 local families have invested more than $2 billion to save up for college — “a Ponzi scheme, essentially.”

The crowd chuckled.

A Ponzi scheme is a criminal swindle, so maybe they were laughing in shock? In a Ponzi, the investment is an illusion; investors get paid returns with money from an ever-increasing supply of newer investors. If — when — the supply dwindles, the pyramid collapses.

Is that what’s going on with GET?

“No, GET is not like a Ponzi scheme, not at all,” said state Treasurer Jim McIntire, when I asked him about Young’s comment. “I would hope that what was going on here is that he misspoke.”

GET, or Guaranteed Education Tuition, is factually not like a Ponzi scheme, except in the most superficial ways. For starters, it’s an open book. Last month it got an “A” risk rating from the state actuary. It has $2.5 billion invested, in federal bonds and equity funds, that last year returned a healthy 16 percent.

It also isn’t relying on an increasing supply of investors. GET works by selling prepaid tuition “units” at a premium on today’s tuition prices, guaranteeing that when it’s time to cash in, 100 of the units will be worth a year of school at the most expensive state university.

It’s true that like with Social Security or some pensions, GET can get out of whack if its liabilities soar. That happened when the UW’s tuition was boosted by double-digit percentages year after year.

But the program fixed this the way private insurance does — by raising its premiums. It announced this publicly. If GET is a Ponzi scheme for relying on a mix of investments, new customers and premium adjustments, then so is the private insurance industry.

This reminds me of when GOP presidential candidate Rick Perry called Social Security a Ponzi scheme (even though it hasn’t missed a benefit payment in 74 years!) It’s not a rhetorical level I was expecting the top university official in our state to stoop to.

What’s the deal, President Young?

“It’s incendiary, I admit,” Young said when I called him. “But this can be a real go-along to get-along community. You have to be a little incendiary around here to get people’s attention.”

Young said the GET program, because it’s a defined-benefit plan (it pledges to pay no matter what happens to the investments), is a ticking time bomb. He compared it to Detroit going bankrupt in part due to its crippling defined-benefit pensions.

“It’s 100 percent predictable that this is going to go south,” Young said. “It might be fine now, but let’s have this conversation six years from now. It’s going to need an infusion of capital to prop it up.”

That’s not what the state actuary predicts. But I can’t say who’s right.

What’s rankling about all this is that GET is about the only college help in this state for the middle class. It’s no get-rich-quick scheme. What it is, essentially, is a tuition version of Social Security.

So as with Social Security, if there’s some problem, let’s fix it! Deriding it as a Ponzi scheme — falsely — seems only destructive to me.

“I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t be calling me to have this debate at all if I hadn’t called it a Ponzi scheme,” Young said.

Touché. He’s right about that. But I have my doubts the Rick Perry style of community engagement is going to play very well around here.

Danny Westneat’s column appears Wednesday and Sunday. Reach him at 206-464-2086 or dwestneat@seattletimes.com



News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Want free career advice? And an iPad Mini?

Want free career advice? And an iPad Mini?

Tell us about your goals and challenges and be considered for a future NWjobs career-makeover story, as well as a chance to win an iPad Mini!

Advertising

About Danny Westneat

Danny Westneat takes an opinionated look at the Puget Sound region's news, people and politics. Send tips or comments to dwestneat@seattletimes.com. His column runs Wednesday and Sunday.
dwestneat@seattletimes.com | 206-464-2086

Partner Video

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►