Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Wednesday, November 27, 2013 at 5:57 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (28)
  • Print

City drops rule that child-care providers meet with union reps

Protests and a threatened lawsuit prompted the retreat from a policy that required the meeting under the threat of Seattle day-care centers losing city funding.


Seattle Times staff reporter

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Thank goodness some sanity has emerged on this ridiculous issue. McShcwin sold his sou... MORE
Finally, a glimmer of sanity. Mikee deserves a swift kick to the nads on his way out... MORE
Good Riddance FORMER May0r McGinn MORE

advertising

The city of Seattle has backed off from a controversial requirement that child-care centers meet with union representatives or lose city funding.

In response to pressure from providers and the threat of a lawsuit, city officials decided to make meetings optional instead of mandatory.

“Providers are no longer required to sign the amendment to the Vendor Services Agreement that was sent on Oct. 16. Since the new policy is voluntary, no providers will be placed on ‘no new enrollment’ status for failing to comply,” city interim Human Services Department Director Catherine Lester wrote in a letter Tuesday.

The Seattle City Council had raised legal questions about the requirement, as well.

“I think I can speak for a whole lot of child-care providers in saying that we’re thrilled with the change in direction,” said Bob Gilbertson, president and CEO of the YMCA of Greater Seattle. “The consortium that sort of came together over this issue, it’s consistent with what we had all hoped for.”

The directive said all child-care providers who rely on the city — either for funding or for an agreement that allows them to operate in public schools — must sign a “teacher stabilization agreement” with a union.

Mayor Mike McGinn proposed the change in city policy this fall, amid a re-election campaign backed heavily by the labor organizations that could represent child-care workers. That caused some people to question whether the directive was politically motivated.

His spokesman said this month it wasn’t.

The idea of unionizing child-care workers is not new in Seattle. Supporters say it would stabilize a workforce with high turnover and would improve teacher quality. Improving quality is a big element of the city’s effort to provide universal preschool.

The proposal would not have forced anyone to join a union, but Gilbertson said the mayor’s October directive would have threatened his direct relationship with his employees. And if a newly unionized workforce led to having to pay his employees more, Gilbertson said, he would be forced to pass on the cost to families.

Emily Heffter: 206-464-8246 or eheffter@seattletimes.com. On Twitter: @EmilyHeffter



News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The summer is wide open.

The summer is wide open.

Follow our three-part "Washington's National Parks" series running through August 10 for an in-depth look at some of our local treasures.

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►