Skip to main content

Originally published October 18, 2013 at 8:34 PM | Page modified October 19, 2013 at 1:13 AM

  • Share:
  • Comments (79)
  • Print

Coca-Cola, Pepsi among key brands that oppose Initiative 522

A food-industry group that has spent millions of dollars opposing a food-labeling initiative disclosed the names of about three dozen contributors on Friday.

The Associated Press

The ABCs of GMOs

Kelly Shea / The Seattle Times

Click the graphic to learn more about GMOs.

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Yeah folks just look at the companies lining up to quash 522 ... top-notch purveyors of... MORE
What are they so worried about - if they have nothing to hide? Do they think people... MORE
Too bad the mainstream media gives so much credibility to the tin-foil-lined-cap crowd... MORE


Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Nestlé are among the major brands that contributed to an effort to oppose Initiative 522, the food-labeling initiative on the November ballot, according to documents made public Friday.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) identified about three dozen companies that contributed a combined $7.2 million to help defeat I-522, which would require labeling on genetically modified foods.

The association released the list after a lawsuit from the state Attorney General’s Office. Attorney General Bob Ferguson has said the association improperly collected the cash in a manner that shielded the identities of the companies to protect them from scrutiny.

Pepsi was the biggest contributor to the cause, giving $1.6 million. The soft-drink company was followed by Coca-Cola and Nestlé, which each contributed a little more than $1 million, according to documents.

Other contributors included General Mills, Kellogg, Hershey and ConAgra.

Ferguson said the agreement for the association to disclose the donors removes the need to seek court intervention.

“The people of Washington demand transparency in elections,” Ferguson said in a statement. “I’m pleased the GMA board recognized their responsibility to disclose the names of companies who contributed to opposing Initiative 522, and the amount of their contributions.”

Voters are starting to receive ballots in what has shaped up to be one of the costliest initiative fights ever in Washington state.

Supporters say consumers have a right to know whether foods they buy contain genetically engineered ingredients and contend that the genetically engineered label is no different from other food labels.

Foes say it would cost farmers and food processors and such a label implies the food is somehow less safe.

In California last year, voters narrowly rejected a genetically engineered labeling measure after opponents mounted a $46 million defense.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

 Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

99¢ for four weeks of unlimited digital access.


Partner Video


The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►