Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Thursday, August 22, 2013 at 7:31 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (14)
  • Print

Lawsuit: Puyallup police videotaped female detainees undressing

A lawsuit filed Thursday claims Puyallup police officers selectively videotaped and watched young women change their clothes and use the toilet while in custody.

Seattle Times staff reporter

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Real men would not do things like this. MORE
This is why people should not surrender all power to governments. Police probably chose... MORE
Interesting that they felt it was necessary to video tape them while in holding cells... MORE

advertising

Puyallup police selectively videotaped and watched young women change their clothes and use the toilet while in custody, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in Pierce County Superior Court.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 11 women and one man who say they were videotaped in various states of undress by officers in the city jail’s holding cells.

Attorney James Egan said the plaintiffs were “detained for misdemeanors only to become the victims” of what he called “felony voyeurism.”

Egan said he began investigating the Police Department’s booking and surveillance practices more than two years ago. He called the practice of observing detainees a “peepshow.”

But Puyallup City Attorney Kevin Yamamoto responds that cameras in jail holding cells are nothing new, that all Puyallup detainees are required to change into jail clothes for mug shots and that Egan went through the jailhouse videos and “cherry-picked” for alleged victims.

According to Egan, the plaintiffs all had been detained by Puyallup police on suspicion of driving under the influence.

They were taken to the police station, where several plaintiffs say they were patted down thoroughly and in a sexual manner, according to the suit.

They then were directed into a video-monitored holding cell where they were told to strip and change into jail clothes for their mug shots, according to the lawsuit. Egan said there is no reason to require someone to change clothes to pose for a mug shot.

He said many of the plaintiffs were released within hours of being booked.

Egan said he came across the practice a few years ago after filing public-disclosure requests in cases involving two separate women who had retained him to defend them in DUI cases. The documentation in both cases included videos of the women undressed or using the holding cell’s toilet.

“I have defended thousands of DUI cases over years and I have never ­ — I mean never — come across anything like this,” said Egan.

Those two cases piqued his curiosity, and Egan said he began filing public-disclosure requests on other DUI cases. He says his investigation showed that some detainees were allowed to change in private, but that it appeared “young and attractive women” were being directed to the holding cells with cameras.

Egan believes the practice violates both state and federal privacy laws and the constitutional right to be free from unwarranted searches and seizures.

His co-counsel, Julie Kays, a former King County prosecutor, said there also are questions about whether the jail officers were involved in voyeurism.

One plaintiff, a 22-year-old Puyallup woman arrested on suspicion of DUI in April, said she was mortified to learn of the video and feared it could find its way to the Internet as part of the public record.

In addition to damages, the suit asks the court to order those portions of the records sealed and to direct police to remove the cameras from the holding cells.

The woman alleges she was manhandled by the booking officer, who cupped her breasts and patted her down in a sexual manner. The officer asked her to change her clothes and directed her to a cell. The woman said she left her underwear on, but said the officer confronted her about it and sent her back inside to remove her undergarments.

Yamamoto said the city jail follows procedures and practices that are in place throughout the state and that cameras in holding cells serve justifiable purposes.

For example, he said, information from the cameras can be used to determine how a fight started and who was involved, or whether an inmate’s claim of being injured is legitimate. “People regularly claim they got hurt in the bathrooms. This allows us to show if it was self-inflicted,” Yamamoto said.

The suit was filed after Puyallup refused to meet settlement demands of between $10,000 and $100,000 per plaintiff.

Christine Clarridge can be reached at cclarridge@seattletimes.com or 206-464-8983.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Seattle Sketcher Book

Seattle Sketcher Book

Take home the Seattle Sketcher's latest book! Available now.

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►