Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published May 24, 2013 at 10:59 PM | Page modified May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (1)
  • Print

Groups ask for big picture in Northwest coal-ports decision

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is being asked to consider the cumulative, worldwide effects of opening three coal ports in the Northwest.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
Here's a sensible solution: Let's ship coal to China and than they can ship it back... MORE

advertising

GRANTS PASS, Ore. — Environmental groups and a public health organization want the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to consider the big picture — from mining in Wyoming to air pollution in China — before allowing development of three Northwest ports to ship up to 100 million metric tons of coal a year to Asia.

The groups filed a formal petition Wednesday asking the corps to consider all three ports together — two in Washington and one in Oregon — as well as the environmental and health effects of more coal mining, massive coal trains and greenhouse gas emissions.

“We are deeply concerned that each of these projects will go through environmental review without an opportunity to consider the bigger picture of what it means for the region if all or some of the proposed terminals are built and operated, particularly in communities distant from the terminals themselves,” the petition said.

Corps of Engineers spokesman Scott Clemans said they are currently looking at the ports individually, and considering the local impacts, such as building docks, dredging and changes to wetlands.

He said they would have to decide whether the current analyses are inadequate to do something broader.

The corps is looking at proposals to develop facilities along the Columbia River at Longview and the Port of Morrow, Ore., and at Cherry Point near Bellingham. The two Washington ports are being analyzed with an environmental-impact statement. The Oregon port is being looked at with a less demanding environmental analysis.

Supporters of developing the ports said the current process is fine.

“We believe that the environmental impact study the Corps is now doing is the way to go,” said Lauri Hennessey, spokeswoman for the Alliance for Northwest Jobs and Exports. “There’s no need for anything else. We believe this is just a stall tactic.”

Last week, a group of 57 tribes, The Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, adopted a resolution opposing the coal ports.

“Our treaties and natural resources and our way of life is in jeopardy, and we are left with no other option than to fully oppose any and all current and proposed coal transport and export projects in Washington and Oregon,” Yakama Nation Chairman Harry Smiskin said in a statement.

Associated Press Writer Eugene Johnson contributed to this report.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

Get 8 weeks of digital access to The Seattle Times for $1

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising

The Seattle Times Historical Archives

Browse our newspaper page archives from 1900-1984


Advertising
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►