Skip to main content

Originally published May 22, 2013 at 8:27 PM | Page modified May 22, 2013 at 8:34 PM

  • Share:
  • Comments (18)
  • Print

Council panel OKs zoning for big pot-growing operations

Indoor pot-growing operations as large as a football field would be allowed in some Seattle industrial areas under new zoning rules approved by a City Council committee. There’s been little opposition to the proposal.

Seattle Times staff reporter

Pot live chat

Join Times reporter Bob Young and a trio of experts for a live chat at noon Friday at

Joining us will be state Liquor Control Board Deputy Director Rick Garza, ACLU of Washington drug-policy director Alison Holcomb, and dispensary owner John Davis.

Submit questions early to

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
This seems like a good first step but eventually we're going to have to change this... ... MORE
Why would someone locate a grow operation in the industrial arena with the current land... MORE
Can you tell me what bank is going to provide lending to either a growing, wholesale or... MORE


Indoor pot-growing operations as large as a football field would be allowed in some Seattle industrial areas under new zoning approved Wednesday by a City Council committee.

The proposed rules would prohibit large indoor farms in the industrial sanctuaries closest to the Port of Seattle and maritime businesses, which represent 46 percent of Seattle’s industrial land.

But over the objections of the North Seattle Industrial Association, council members voted to permit growing operations of up to 50,000 square feet in the city’s other workhorse zones for industry.

The association doesn’t want to see growing operations drive up property values and rents for existing businesses, said Eugene Wasserman, the group’s president. “Our members are afraid of being priced out,” he said. “We have nothing against marijuana.”

Council members reasoned that growing operations as big as 50,000 square feet — slightly bigger than a football field without end zones — are warranted because the real estate needed to have many smaller indoor farms is scarce, and economies of scale achieved by larger farms might lower production costs and pot prices. Big farms might be easier to secure, as well.

At the same time, Councilmember Nick Licata acknowledged the city is in a “bit of the Twilight Zone,” trying to help a young industry amid a confusing regulatory landscape.

Rules for the state’s new legal recreational pot market haven’t yet been written. Medical marijuana is largely unregulated. And the federal government considers all forms of marijuana illegal.

“This is a fluid situation. I don’t pretend to have all the answers,” Licata said.

Licata, along with Councilmembers Sally Clark and Bruce Harrell, voted for large indoor farms in all industrial lands except the Industrial General 1 zone, the most protective of the sanctuaries for manufacturing and maritime-related business.

Councilmember Sally Bagshaw, who voted no, wanted to bar pot growing in the IG1 zone, and limit it to 10,000 square feet — roughly the size of a drugstore — in the other industrial areas.

“Substituting urban agriculture for industrial uses doesn’t make a lot of sense,” Bagshaw said.

That’s particularly the case, she said, when pot can be grown under the sun in Eastern Washington according to some activists, and the maritime industries are limited in where they can go.

The full council is expected to take up the issue June 3.

Licata suggested adding a provision that would call for the council to revisit the rules after a year, and again after two years.

“This is certainly not a land grab,” said Philip Dawdy, representing two pot businesses.

The industrial areas were the only places, Dawdy said, where growing would be allowed by the city and not run afoul of the state’s 1,000-foot buffer between pot businesses and sites frequented by minors, such as schools and parks.

The proposed city rules would bar large growing operations in residential, historic and small neighborhood commercial areas.

But the rules — in borrowing from medical-marijuana regulations — would permit growing as many as 45 pot plants in homes throughout the city.

The idea, explained Darby DuComb of the City Attorney’s Office, is to make Seattle’s rules compatible with both the medical and recreational systems.

The medical system allows patients to form collectives and grow as many as 45 plants. The state’s new recreational system does not allow home cultivation.

The city’s home-growing rules could undercut the state’s recreational system. Instead of going to state-taxed stores to buy pot, Seattle residents could grow their own.

It would be up to the state to enforce its rules, said DuComb, chief of staff for City Attorney Pete Holmes.

Bob Young: 206-464-2174 or

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Time to add another piece to your Hawks collection

Time to add another piece to your Hawks collection

Check out the full lineup of championship merchandise from The Seattle Times store.


Partner Video


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►