Skip to main content

Originally published April 5, 2013 at 9:31 PM | Page modified April 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM

  • Share:
  • Comments (14)
  • Print

Budget OK’d with bipartisan support in Senate

But the lack of new taxes and cuts to social-service programs leave some Democrats unhappy as the spending plan moves ahead.

The Associated Press

How would you balance the state budget and fund education?

Cut spending? Increase taxes? Some of each? Here's your chance to take a swing at balancing the state budget. Our interactive budget game lets you pick from dozens of potential budget cuts and tax increases to balance the budget and find more money for education. more →

State's education-funding dilemma

Click the graphic to learn more about education funding and where it might be headed.

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
"But the lack of new taxes...... leave some Democrats unhappy " Nothing... MORE
Shifting the WEA to Obamacare was brilliant. Good job Senate ... this is Change is can... MORE
unamerican socialist, clearly you expected the judicial mandate to increase spending o... MORE


OLYMPIA — A bipartisan group of state senators advanced a budget plan Friday night that balances spending without new taxes, relying on cuts to social programs and fund transfers that irked some Democrats.

Budget writers from both parties said the spending proposal was developed with input from both sides, and the final vote included support from 21 Republicans and nine Democrats.

Republican Sen. Andy Hill said the measure includes some tough decisions, but helps reprioritize state spending without relying on taxes.

“The last thing we want to do at this point is take money out of their pockets when they’re struggling and when small businesses are struggling,” Hill said.

Democrats proposed a variety of amendments to the budget, seeking to add even more money to education and restore some money to social-services programs.

Sen. Sharon Nelson, a liberal Democrat from Maury Island who helped develop the budget and voted in favor of it, said the vote was difficult for her.

Nelson said the state needs new revenue to help pay for education and the social-safety net.

“The poor are hurt in this budget, and it’s painful for all of us,” Nelson said.

Senate Democratic Leader Ed Murray and other Democrats cited the cuts and a lack of revenue in explaining why they were voting against the measure.

One of the most contentious cuts would eliminate a program that provides cash aid to blind, disabled or older people who are typically waiting for approval of federal benefits.

Lawmakers would also cut $180 million from a state welfare program, including child care for the working poor.

The House has yet to unveil its budget plan, but Gov. Jay Inslee has called the Senate budget “deeply flawed.”

Inslee has sought to raise $1.2 billion by extending taxes that were set to expire and eliminating or changing tax breaks.

Compared with the current budget, the spending plan in the Senate would add $1.5 billion more to K-12 education, including $1 billion toward satisfying last year’s state Supreme Court ruling that the state wasn’t meeting its constitutional obligation to properly fund education.

Some of the biggest budget changes include the repeal of a voter-approved initiative that provides cost-of-living raises for teachers, redirecting the assumed $320 million to basic education.

The budget also transfers money from other accounts, like the construction budget, to help balance spending.

Senators were also able to balance the budget because of some $300 million in savings that come from a Medicaid expansion under President Obama’s health-care law.

Republicans control the Senate with the help of two Democrats, known as the Majority Coalition Caucus. Democratic Sen. Jim Hargrove, the top budget writer in the minority, praised Hill for including him in the process.

“It was very open and very inclusive,” Hargrove said.

Still, Hargrove added that he hoped the budget would change — and revenue would be considered — as negotiations expand to include the House and governor in the coming weeks.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►