Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published March 21, 2013 at 8:34 PM | Page modified March 22, 2013 at 9:41 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (28)
  • Print

Hedging by utilities cost Washington ratepayers $800M

Officials say the hedging practices of natural-gas companies, which do it to avoid dramatic changes in gas prices, have cost Washington ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

The Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
ths article conveniently omits how the natural gas companies save consumers money by... MORE
Mills said there will be times when there are losses, but the program isn’t... MORE
Higher tax, higher utility bills....... Whatever they screwed up, the general public... MORE

advertising

OLYMPIA — The hedging practices of natural-gas companies in Washington state have cost ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars in recent years, and officials said Thursday they are recommending a moratorium on new hedging arrangements.

The state Attorney General’s Office said it wants the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission to continue investigating the hedging strategies used by utilities, in which the companies purchase gas futures in order to protect against sudden price increases.

Lisa Gafken, an assistant attorney general, said companies have no real incentive to improve their purchasing efforts — something that is evident in the losses during recent years.

“They didn’t prudently manage their hedging strategies,” she said.

In the past five years, the natural-gas companies incurred hedging losses of about $800 million, according to the Attorney General’s Office. Those costs are passed directly to ratepayers. Gafken said ratepayers face more losses in the future because the companies already are locked in other futures contracts at high gas rates.

Utilities use hedging to avoid dramatic changes in gas prices. With an economic downturn and increased domestic production in recent years, natural-gas prices fell, contributing to the hedging losses.

But Gafken said there were losses in other years, too, including $60 million in net losses between 2002 and 2007 — a period in which prices increased.

The Attorney General’s Office is recommending that officials place a moratorium on companies from entering into new hedging arrangements.

It also wants state regulators to explore whether there is a way to prevent some hedging costs from being passed to ratepayers. Officials also want to investigate how best to address market fluctuations.

David Mills, vice president of energy supply operations at Puget Sound Energy, compared the hedging efforts to buying insurance. He said the company’s gas traders are not aggressively speculating on the market, but following a steady process based on multiyear forecasts.

Mills said there will be times when there are losses, but the program isn’t designed to gain or lose on the investment. Instead, it helps protect consumers from sudden spikes and upward trends in the market. Mills said removing the ability to purchase futures contracts on natural gas would leave ratepayers at the whim of the spot price, making it even more volatile. “The hedging is really just a method to remove variability,” he said.

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission is holding a meeting on the issue Friday.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon


Advertising

Your free access has ended.

Subscribe today for unlimited access! Our introductory rate of only 99¢ a week includes:

  • Unlimited access to seattletimes.com
  • Seattle Times smartphone and tablet Web apps
  • Daily Print Replica -- an exact digital copy of the newspaper
Subscription options

Already a subscriber?

Digital access is already included with your print subscription!

Log in with your MyTimes account:
Subscriber login

If you've never used MyTimes:
Register your subscription