Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published February 3, 2013 at 8:26 PM | Page modified February 3, 2013 at 8:45 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (22)
  • Print

Lawmakers to reconsider digital billboards on state highways

Legislation to allow digital billboards along state highways is being proposed again in Olympia.

The News Tribune

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
The ones along I-5 approaching Tacoma from the north (Fife, Milton?) have so many white... MORE
Do we really need more corporate litter dotting the landscape? MORE
The public does not want billboards. It is pathetic that a nationwide corporation, like... MORE

advertising

Legislation that would allow digital billboards along state highways is bubbling up again in Olympia.

Both the House and Senate are considering changes to state law. Each body’s transportation committee has scheduled a hearing on the measures for Tuesday.

Electronic signs aren’t allowed along state highways. The legislation maintains existing limits on signs, including keeping them in industrial and commercial areas. Digital signs also couldn’t have flashing or moving lights — the message would have to be static.

Clear Channel Outdoor put up its newest digital billboard recently in Tukwila, on city-owned property near the Southcenter mall. A company spokesman said five traditional billboard faces were removed in Tukwila before the digital sign went up. The company has nine other digital boards in Western Washington.

The bills this year are generally the same as those proposed for the past two years. The measures apply to the state highway system only, not to areas along interstates. They also don’t force municipalities to allow them. If a company wanted to build a digital billboard on a state highway within an incorporated area, that jurisdiction’s approval would be needed before the state would issue a permit.

Opponents argue billboards, particularly digital signs, are visual blight. Scenic America, a national advocacy group, sued the federal government recently, arguing that an agency’s allowance of digital signs on national highways violates the Highway Beautification Act.

Supporters argue the signs expand public networks for emergency messages like Amber Alerts. The measures in Olympia state that digital-billboard owners must coordinate with government to use the boards for such messages free of charge.

In 2011, the Senate approved the measure, but it died in the House.

Last fall, the city of Tacoma and Clear Channel Outdoor called a timeout on a federal lawsuit over the number and location of billboards in the city. The two-year “standstill” agreement was also intended as time for the city and the company to negotiate a billboard “consolidation” plan that would remove billboards from some parts of the city in exchange for allowing billboards in others.

Those negotiations haven’t begun, said Ian Munce, a planning manager for Tacoma who is leading the city’s team.

“That bill would (seem to) affect what we’re discussing, but we haven’t started discussions,” Munce said Friday.

If state law changes to allow digital signs on state highways within cities and towns, that would “seem to open up some new locations” in Tacoma.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times photographs

Seattle space needle and mountains

Purchase The Seattle Times images


Advertising