Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Thursday, October 31, 2013 at 5:30 AM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Beware being judgmental about beau’s alcoholic friend

Carolyn Hax hears from a reader who says of boyfriend’s friend: “I do not want an alcoholic in my life.”


Syndicated columnist

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

Dear Carolyn

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

DEAR CAROLYN: Is it ever OK to veto one of your significant other’s friendships? My boyfriend is thinking of getting back in touch with a friend of his who was an alcoholic who self-destructed and refused help — at which point my boyfriend ended his friendship with him.

I do not want an alcoholic in my life, I can’t see how this is a good idea, and I’m not comfortable with this at all.

— Vetoing

DEAR VETOING: Er, major piece of information missing: Has the friend since gotten sober, or is he still abusing?

Be careful, too, how you throw those absolutes around. “I do not want an alcoholic in my life” is the kind of thing that inspires people to say, “I do not want judgmental people in my life.” Someone who gets and stays sober is still an alcoholic; is that person also unworthy of you?

RE: VETO: No, it is not OK to veto one of your significant other’s friendships. The only thing it is OK to do is to remove yourself from situations you don’t want to be in. You cannot control anything another person does/says/thinks. I believe this is Rule No. 1 of Hax. And to quote Monty Python, Rule 2, same as Rule 1.

— Anonymous

DEAR ANONYMOUS: Yep, that, thanks.

You do have the right, in exceptional situations, to object strenuously (reference to a different kind of cinematic comedy) to a friendship and ask your partner to end it. The classic example is someone with whom your partner cheated on you, or someone else who deliberately tried to harm you or the relationship. If you are not personally injured by this objectionable friend, then I see the bar as pretty high — abuse, for example. Child pornography. Animal cruelty.

Of course, when you get to any of these points, you’re often right back to “remove yourself from situations you don’t want to be in,” relationships included.

There is NO Rule 6.

RE: VETO: Just because the boyfriend is going to see his former friend doesn’t mean Vetoing needs to. Do they not ever socialize apart?

— Anonymous 2

DEAR ANONYMOUS 2: True. However, if experience says that an innocent-sounding “going to see his former friend” will quickly morph into receiving wee-hours phone calls to bail out a still-drinking alcoholic friend, then I think a little leeway on this is fair.

For the last word, I’m throwing in a third movie reference: “You’ll never be a first-class human being ... until you’ve learned to have some regard for human frailty” (http://bit.ly/GQ6Q5N).

DEAR CAROLYN: My father recently passed away. My adult stepdaughter, who has always been somewhat of a challenge, has known my father just about all her life, and texted me a message of condolence. I am having a hard time with that. I know she is of the “social media” generation but isn’t that taking it a bit too far?

— Stepparent

DEAR STEPPARENT: I could easily agree, but instead I urge you not to look for reasons to be disappointed in people. You will always, always find them.

Instead, please look for reasons to be grateful: Your always-challenging stepdaughter thought of you and expressed her sympathy.

I’m sorry for your loss.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com and follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax. Find her columns daily at www.seattletimes.com/living



News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Bake cookies for a cause

Bake cookies for a cause

Get 23 scrumptious recipes in our "Quintessential Cookies" e-book. One dollar of your $3.95 purchase goes to Fund For The Needy.

Advertising

Partner Video

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►