Originally published Saturday, February 28, 2009 at 12:00 AM
EcoConsumer
Striking an efficient balance in the wood-burning debate
From changing regulations to new technology, let's burn through some common consumer questions about heating with wood.
Special to The Seattle Times
Humans have burned wood for heat for more than 15,000 years, so you would think we'd have it all figured out by now.
But it's still a work in progress. Although the efficiency of new woodstoves and fireplaces continues to improve, concerns have grown about the hazards of wood smoke, especially from older or improperly used units.
From changing regulations to new technology, let's burn through some common consumer questions about heating with wood.
Q: Is it true that we now have stricter burn bans?
A: Yes. As the result of new state and federal air quality regulations, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (www.pscleanair.org) beefed up its burn-ban program this winter. During a Stage 2 ban, no burning is allowed in any woodstove, wood-burning fireplace, fireplace insert or pellet stove unless it's your only heat source. A Stage 1 ban applies only to fireplaces, uncertified woodstoves and fireplace inserts.
The first Stage 2 burn ban this winter was called on Jan. 19 for King, Pierce, Snohomish and Kitsap counties during a spell of stagnant weather, and it lasted for five days. This was our first Stage 2 ban since 1991.
Q: Why is there so much concern about wood smoke?
A: Tiny particles and other pollutants in smoke can cause many health problems, including asthma, heart attacks and cancer. A University of Washington study found that Seattle preschool children who live in neighborhoods with higher wood-smoke levels had more symptoms of respiratory disease.
Q: Then is a gas fireplace the way to go?
A: Gas or electric fireplaces do not produce neighborhood pollution. But wood heat does have advantages, if you have a clean-burning system. Wood is a renewable resource, and because it's a biomass fuel — not a fossil fuel like oil or gas — it doesn't contribute to global warming nearly as much. Wood also often costs less than other types of heat.
Q: Which woodstoves are most efficient?
A: Older fireplaces, woodstoves and fireplace inserts typically waste a lot of fuel and have a heating efficiency rating of less than 50 percent. Newer, certified models of those types of units will usually be more than 60 percent efficient, while pellet stoves generally exceed 75 percent efficiency. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency offers a list of certified stoves and tips for proper wood-burning practices at www.epa.gov/woodstoves.
![]()
Q: Pellet stoves sound great. What should I know about them?
A: Starting at about $1,700, pellet stoves are more expensive than most other woodstoves and fireplaces. Since they require electricity, you can't use pellet stoves during power outages. In addition, the cost and availability of wood pellet fuel (usually made from compressed sawdust) can fluctuate widely. But in terms of efficiency and reduced smoke pollution, pellet stoves are hard to beat.
They also have local connections. Jerry Whitfield, a Boeing engineer and inventor, developed the modern residential pellet stove in the Seattle area in the early 1980s. Today, 60 percent of wood pellet stoves on the market are manufactured in Washington state, according to U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell's office.
Q: Does the government offer any incentives to buy clean-burning fireplaces or stoves?
A: The big news is that the economic-stimulus bill signed Feb. 17 by President Obama includes a 30 percent tax credit for 2009 and 2010 for biomass stoves with 75 percent efficiency, which should include nearly all pellet stoves. Visit www.hpba.org for more info.
So, as Seattle native Jimi Hendrix sang, "Let me stand next to your fire." Just make sure it burns clean.
Tom Watson is project manager for King County's Recycling and Environmental Services.
Reach him at tom.watson@kingcounty.gov, 206-296-4481 or www.KCecoconsumer.com
Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
On the left hand, answers aren't easy
UPDATE - 09:35 AM
Late Mardi Gras meets spring break for rowdy fete
UPDATE - 09:39 AM
Kate vs. Catherine; the Royal name dilemma
Prince William, Kate Middleton visit Belfast

nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new car? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Fasting woman to end attempt to ‘live on light’
- Ride-share cars: illegal, and all over Seattle
- Everett may be left out of 787-10 plans
- Report: NHL’s Phoenix Coyotes could move to Seattle if local deal fails
- ‘I don’t want to be only person cured of HIV’
- Mastros defend their actions, plan to ‘retire in peace’
- Supreme Court: Pre-Miranda silence can be used as evidence of guilt
- Teen cyclist hit, killed in charity ride
- Too early to claim Xbox defeat just from E3 buzz
- 2 charged with stealing 4.3 miles of copper wire from Sound Transit
- Game thread: Aaron Harang tries for better results in Anaheim
346 - Court: Ariz. citizenship proof law illegal
98 - Justin Smoak appears headed up to rejoin reeling Mariners
94 - Justin Smoak tries to save Mariners, reputation of young 'core'
94 - Taxi drivers stage a protest parade
84 - Woman trying to ‘live on light’ instead of food ends experiment
75 - Mastros staying in France
67 - Mariners destroyed in Anaheim again
44 - $231 million revenue jump could help break state budget stalemate
42 - ‘I don’t want to be only person cured of HIV’
40
- Ride-share cars: illegal, and all over Seattle
- One tough old bird rules the parking lot
- Got a great buy on a cruise? That’s not all you’ll spend
- It’s curtains for Seattle’s Egyptian Theatre
- Weyerhaeuser pays $2.6B to snag Longview Timber
- Everett may be left out of 787-10 plans
- ‘I don’t want to be only person cured of HIV’
- Fasting woman to end attempt to ‘live on light’
- Fifth-grader’s poem wins national contest
- Mastros defend their actions, plan to ‘retire in peace’





