Petersen: Substance over style
The Huskies landed someone that many regard as a top-five coach. Here’s the catch, though: You might not be able to embrace him, at least not regularly, unless Petersen tailors his approach. You’ll have to settle for respecting him. It should be all that matters.
Times staff columnist
The new face of Husky football is a stern one. Chris Petersen doesn’t have a Hallmark card personality. He’s a taciturn type.
If the late, legendary Washington crew coach Al Ulbrickson hadn’t been nicknamed the Dour Dane, it could’ve been a moniker for Petersen. He’s from the Don James school of football coaching, which is to say that his substance far exceeds his style.
You can’t resist comparing the new coach to the previous one and pondering whether Washington hired up. Steve Sarkisian has departed for USC, one of the top five college football coaching jobs in the nation. But from this view, there are only two things Coach Sark clearly does better than Coach Pete: public speaking and tweeting.
In everything else — the real stuff, the stuff that wins football games — Petersen is as good and often better. From recruiting to developing talent to strategizing, Petersen doesn’t have to take a back seat to any coach in his sport, let alone Sarkisian.
Sark left for a top-five job. The Huskies replaced him with someone who many regard as a top-five coach.
Here’s the catch, though: You might not be able to embrace him, at least not regularly, unless Petersen tailors his approach. You’ll have to settle for respecting him.
It should be all that matters.
Petersen has a little mad scientist in him, and it worked amazingly at Boise State. He possesses an introverted style with the media and general public. Between Sunday and Friday, he runs the most boring program in the country. Then, on Saturday, you’re treated to an impressive show of creativity, toughness and triumph.
On the surface, that’s a moderate concern, only because Tyrone Willingham failed miserably using a similar approach. But Petersen is more savvy and isn’t quite as rigid. Besides, the biggest problem with Willingham wasn’t his approach; it was that winning didn’t accompany it.
Petersen would be foolish to run his program in Seattle in the exact fashion that he ran things in Boise. He’ll need to be a little more open. He’ll need to recognize that Husky football is treated more like a pro sport here. His every move will be scrutinized in Seattle. And now that he’ll be, by far, the highest-paid public employee in the state, Petersen must understand the responsibility attached.
But don’t expect Coach Pete to turn into coach Pete Carroll.
Well, don’t expect it unless we’re talking about results.
Just like Carroll came to the Seahawks touting a way of doing things that transcends the level of football, Petersen’s tactics and philosophies can translate similarly.
Petersen posted a 92-12 record at Boise State, winning an absurd 88.5 percent of his games. Before going 8-4 this season, he was winning more than 90 percent of his games. It’s easy to dismiss Petersen’s gaudy record as merely the result of running a great program in a non-BCS conference. But look inside those numbers.
The Broncos were 5-2 in bowl games under Petersen, including two victories in the Fiesta Bowl (a BCS bowl) in 2006 and 2009. Petersen’s teams were 8-6 against ranked opponents, and they had a 9-3 mark against teams from power conferences. Sark’s teams were 7-18 against ranked opponents over the past five years.
Without question, there’s a huge difference between playing a couple of ranked teams a season and facing elite competition for half of your schedule. Petersen must prove that he can consistently have the Huskies ready for the big game. But even if he loses twice as much at Washington, he will have returned the program to dominance.
Petersen knows all about living up to a high standard. Dirk Koetter and Dan Hawkins had a combined 79-21 record at Boise State before Petersen, Hawkins’ offensive coordinator, took over. Koetter and Hawkins, both of whom went on to fail at bigger jobs, made the program a midmajor power. Then Petersen made the Broncos a national power.
Petersen doesn’t have to do the major building at Washington, either. Sarkisian already did that. Petersen will inherit a program that has had four consecutive winning seasons. His challenge: To dominate. And to do so as quickly as possible.
It sounds like the perfect job for a coach’s coach, a man more obsessed with winning than anything else.
Petersen won’t charm you with his small talk, but at Boise State, he built a program that charmed on the national stage. His sincere, straightforward style has always been a hit in recruiting. And when he’s in the lab doing his mad scientist thing, he always seems to concoct methods that enable his teams to be sound against any caliber of opponent.
Petersen isn’t likely to lead the Pac-12 in one-liners. That’s OK, though. Washington prefers Rose Bowls, anyway.
Jerry Brewer: 206-464-2277 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
About Jerry Brewer
Jerry Brewer offers a unique perspective on the world of sports.
email@example.com | 206-464-2277