Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Monday, January 7, 2013 at 8:53 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Hepburn house owner loses court fight in Conn.

A prominent New York City developer balked when he was ordered to shave a foot off the height of two 5-foot granite posts he had installed at the driveway entrance to Katharine Hepburn's former estate along the Connecticut shore.

Associated Press

Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
No comments have been posted to this article.
Start the conversation >

advertising

HARTFORD, Conn. —

A prominent New York City developer balked when he was ordered to shave a foot off the height of two 5-foot granite posts he had installed at the driveway entrance to Katharine Hepburn's former estate along the Connecticut shore.

A veteran of navigating zoning rules and regulations, Frank Sciame thought the local historic commission didn't have the authority to issue the order in 2010. His response? Place foot-high flower beds at the base of the posts and tell the commission he was complying with its order.

That didn't sit well with the Historic District Commission of the Borough of Fenwick in Old Saybrook, which began court proceedings that culminated Monday in a state Appellate Court ruling against Sciame, who owns the estate.

The state's second-highest court upheld a lower court ruling and dismissed Sciame's claims that the commission overstepped its authority and inflicted emotional distress on him by making him lower the posts. At a public hearing in June 2010, commission members said they were concerned that the height of the posts made them too visible from surrounding areas, including local streets and a golf course.

The Appellate Court ruled that Sciame didn't appeal the commission's decision within a required 20-day period and that the claims of emotional distress were not legally sufficient.

Sciame's Milford-based lawyer, Genevieve Salvatore, said she wasn't pleased with the court's rulings but respected them. She said no further appeals were planned, and the posts already have been lowered to the required height.

"The facts may seem trivial, but it's the procedure he's concerned about," Salvatore said. "What Mr. Sciame was really concerned about was a governmental entity running roughshod over somebody's rights. I think he was trying to show them ... that I'm not someone who's going to be pushed around."

The commission's lawyer, Lewis Wise, called the case "very, very unfortunate."

"He did the mounding of dirt and basically said, `What are you going to do about it?'" Wise said. "He basically left them (the commission) no choice, and it's too bad."

Sciame founded F.J. Sciame Construction Co. Inc. in Manhattan in 1975. The company's projects have included many notable New York City buildings, including the Pierpont Morgan Library and Museum, the New Victory Theater, Central Synagogue and the exterior restoration of the Guggenheim Museum.

He has served on the executive board of the New York Landmarks Conservancy and was hired by New York officials in 2006 to find ways to reduce the cost of the Sept. 11 memorial at ground zero.

Sciame bought Hepburn's nearly 4-acre estate, which includes an 8,400-square-foot home, for $6 million in 2004. He made extensive renovations and is now trying to sell it for $30 million.

The granite posts mark the beginning of the property's driveway. Sciame had them lowered a few months ago to comply with a judge's ruling.

"Apparently in certain neighborhoods, as in life, size does matter," Judge Robert Holzberg wrote in that August ruling, after a trial. "This is a dispute about 12 inches and how it is measured."

Holzberg found that historic district regulations don't spell out how height is to be measured. He nevertheless sided with the commission but declined to impose fines on Sciame.

After the commission ordered Sciame to lower the posts and he installed the flower beds, he told commissioners that he had no intention of taking further compliance action and "invited" the commission to take enforcement measures against him, according to court records.

"Mr. Sciame is certainly not a bully," Salvatore said. "The decisions he makes, he makes rationally and he makes them in good faith. At the end of the day, I think he didn't want to be bullied."

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Subscribe today!

Subscribe today!

Get four weeks of digital access for 99 cents

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising