Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Friday, January 12, 2007 at 12:00 AM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Editorial

Step up, Democrats, the war is waiting

Democrats in Washington's congressional delegation are crystal clear about their frustrations with President Bush's dismaying speech announcing...

Democrats in Washington's congressional delegation are crystal clear about their frustrations with President Bush's dismaying speech announcing more of the same in Iraq. They need to bring the same clarity to legislative efforts to move the country away from war.

Political arm-waving and high-profile votes on nonbinding resolutions and other artfully worded parliamentary expressions of opposition are worthless. They do not inform the public about the nature of the president's military escalations, and more importantly they do nothing to turn off the flow of dollars that keep the administration's disastrous mission alive.

Parsing out a role for the congressional power of the purse will not be easy. No one wants to undercut the military men and women already in the field, and on organizational and financial levels, the president's call for more troops blends new units and extends others. If it is complicated to mulch through the budget process, well, too bad. Get to work.

Democrats should use their own bully pulpit to press for diplomatic solutions, or at least hector the administration with questions about initiatives and progress on that front. Every bloody day, it is clear there is no military answer.

The president's speech was profoundly disappointing. So many words and so little to say. He made a feint toward acknowledging mistakes in 2006 and 2005. Americans troops in Iraq are suffering the lethal consequences of decisions made four years ago.

The commander in chief said he will send 21,500 more troops to Iraq — more specifically, to Baghdad. Apparently, the strategic goal of a war that began in March 2003 is to secure the capital.

Four thousand soldiers will go to Anbar province, a description embraced so the painful memories of fights in Fallujah and Ramadi are not recalled. That is the same number pulled out of the area and sent to Baghdad after it was concluded no progress would be made against local militias.

With the Iraq economy on its back, the White House decided to hire Iraqis to do the reconstruction jobs American contractors scooped up after the initial invasion.

Democrats were elected to confront the president's grievous war. They are not allowed a news cycle of snappy quotes only to plead legislative complexity in confronting the financial mechanisms that extend the war.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Editorials & Opinion

NEW - 12:45 AM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

George Will / Syndicated columnist: Huckabee's detour from reason in Obama theory

Lance Dickie / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Empower health care reform close to home

Rewind | Seattle Times Editorial Board interviews school officials

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: When punishment is a crime

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising