anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com Editorials and opinion Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events
  NWCLASSIFIEDS
  NWSOURCE
  SHOPPING
  SERVICES


Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

Editorial
Time to make rail fully accountable


E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
Most e-mailed articles Most e-mailed articles

On Tuesday, Sound Transit broke ground on its light-rail project in the Rainier Valley, eight years after voters approved the agency's project. Unfortunately, the project being started is different from the one they approved. It is one-third shorter and its projected ridership is two-thirds less.

Those are among reasons why a citizens' initiative aimed at requiring Sound Transit to resubmit its plans to voters is worth consideration and support in the current signature drive.

When a voter-approved project changes as much as Sound Transit's light rail, normally it is resubmitted to the people. That is common sense and also the common law of Washington going back to the time of streetcar companies. It is the way the people can control their government, and hold it accountable to its promises.

But when citizens took Sound Transit to court to enforce the common law, the agency pulled out Resolution 75. Passed by its governing board in August 1996, Resolution 75 included a grant of power to change the project at will, removing the people's right to keep it accountable.

Sound Transit could not grant itself such a power, but the people might through a vote. Had they? Sound Transit had not mailed Resolution 75 to voters. It had mailed other things but not that. The ballot title for the measure authorizing the Sound Transit taxes, however, had ended with the rhetorical asterisk, "as provided in Resolution No. 75."

The press had not noticed, but a sharp voter might have called Sound Transit, asked what Resolution 75 was and gone to the county auditor's office to read it. Probably not one voter had done that, but they could have done it.

In March, the Washington Supreme Court swallowed that argument, and proclaimed that the people had voted immunity for Sound Transit on that point.

I-894, sponsored in part by Shoreline Democrat Maggie Fimia, aims to reverse that ridiculous decision. Because the people in the Sound Transit district as such have no right of initiative, I-894 is statewide. It recreates the right of initiative that the designers of Sound Transit purposefully left out.

This is the people's last chance to make this agency accountable. They should take it.

More information at: www.trustandtransit.com

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive

More Editorial headlines...

 EDITORIALS & OPINION
 SEARCH

Today Archive

Advanced search

seattletimes.com home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company

Copyright

Back to topBack to top