Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published July 12, 2014 at 4:03 PM | Page modified July 13, 2014 at 5:26 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments
  • Print

Editorial: The Hobby Lobby ruling and the need to protect access to health care

Congress is acting to protect women’s basic health care, and broader coverage, after the Hobby Lobby decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.


Seattle Times Editorial

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
As if women (or name any protected group) are not capable of managing their lives w/o the government "fighting' on... MORE
@2easyrider "Would it not be better just to return to the old-time rule that Congress defines the public interest, and... MORE
"The proposed Protect Women's Health From Corporate Interference Act" LOL!! More like the "Protect Democrats by making... MORE

advertising

WASHINGTON’S Democratic U.S. Sen. Patty Murray is leading the charge in Congress to clarify the intent of federal law to protect access to reproductive health care, and other health services.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its Hobby Lobby decision, ruled that closely held for-profit companies could invoke First Amendment religious protections to avoid paying for contraceptive coverage for employees.

Democrats in the U.S. Senate and House responded quickly to “ensure that no CEO or corporation can come between people and their guaranteed access to health care, period,” Murray said in a statement last week.

The well-founded fear is that employers will try to impose their beliefs to broaden the range of other health services for which they wish to deny benefits. This might include vaccines, blood transfusions or HIV treatment.

The proposed Protect Women’s Health From Corporate Interference Act states and would reaffirm that federal laws, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, do not permit employers to refuse to comply with the Affordable Care Act’s reproductive health-care provisions and other health-benefit laws.

The bill does restate the exemption for religious groups and the accommodation for religious nonprofits.

The Supreme Court decision stunned the four dissenting justices with the breadth of the ruling. Their question was virtually, “What will come next?”

Republicans and other Democrats in the Senate and House need to step up to this legislation, and its basic protections. Does anyone really believe that employees surrender their religious beliefs and civic prerogatives to their employers?

Shuffle the demographics, ethnicities and roles a bit, and no doubt the GOP opponents would be outraged by some potential employer-employee scenarios.

Timely and appropriate legislation in Congress restates the history and intent of existing federal laws so it will be clear, even for the nation’s highest court.

Editorial board members are editorial page editor Kate Riley, Frank A. Blethen, Ryan Blethen, Sharon Pian Chan, Lance Dickie, Jonathan Martin, Erik Smith, Thanh Tan, William K. Blethen (emeritus) and Robert C. Blethen (emeritus).



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►