Advertising

Ed cetera

Join the informed, opinionated journalists of The Times' editorial staff in lively discussions at our blog Ed Cetera.

August 19, 2011 at 2:15 PM

Feds fine on WSU is excessive

Posted by Lynne Varner

An Associated Press story reports a $82,500 federal fine on Washington State University for failing to report two sexual assaults in 2007.

The U.S. Department of Education is getting tougher on college campuses who violate the Clery Act, a federal law requiring campus notification of potential threats to students and employees. They audited the campus crime statistics of about a dozen schools this year, some of those schools remain under investigation and may be fined.

Virginia Tech was fined $55,000 for failing to quickly alert the campus during the 2007 mass shooting that killed 32 students and faculty members. Virginia Tech is appealing, but according to the AP story federal officials retorted that the fine should have been higher.

Sexual assaults are serious crimes and college campuses are rightly held accountable for preventative and responsive measures. WSU is appealing their fine but they do not quarrel with the federal finding of fault. A reasonable question, however, is raised by the size of the fine: How does a school that has made numerous improvements - acknowledged by the feds in a March letter to WSU President Elson Floyd - end up being forced to pay more than a school where dozens died?

UPDATE:

Both schools were wrong and neither pretends otherwise. It is the disproportionate punishment that is up for debate.

In a letter to campus leaders yesterday, WSU's president outlined changes made since the incident, starting with hiring a new police chief, Bill Gardner.

According to Floyd's letter, the police chief "immediately began to reorganize and restructure the department and to develop and implement new policies and procedures, adopting best practices for implementation of the Clery Act reporting requirements. As a result, we now have, and have had since 2008, reviews and safeguards in place that include built in double-checks for all criminal reports."

I might have been suspicious of such a self-serving testimonial except it jibes with the aforementioned March letter to Floyd from federal officials acknowledging the university's corrective steps.

So here's my point: If the federal fine is meant to instill an important lesson, it appears that lesson has been learned. What's my proof? Again quoting from Floyd's letter, "the (federal education) Department has referred other universities to WSU, as a model and resource for best practices."

By the way, I do not think WSU should get off scot-free. Indeed, the appeal may result in a smaller fine which would be appropriate.

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Yet because of the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (and likely other federal statutes regarding the privacy of minors in...  Posted on August 21, 2011 at 6:54 PM by IMFletch. Jump to comment
I really don't think that this is about which school's situation was worse (VT or WSU)... The obvious answer is that VTs situation was...  Posted on August 19, 2011 at 5:02 PM by maverickuw. Jump to comment
It isn't excessive. An appropriate fine would be taken out of the coach's salary for the next five years.  Posted on August 19, 2011 at 4:15 PM by MarkPer. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

Blogroll