Skip to main content

Originally published April 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM | Page modified April 19, 2014 at 8:05 PM

  • Share:
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Petitioning wrong party on wage issue

It used to be businesses and workers negotiated pay and other benefits among themselves. Now they’re both going to government for leverage — with taxpayers squeezed in between.

Seattle Times staff columnist

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
Businesses have many other choices if government tries to impose wages that are not sustainable by the value the... MORE
"Department of Labor Enforcement".......and I though I had just about seen everything in the Soviet City of Seattle. MORE
But Danny, the government is a benevolent master who sees all and knows what's best for all. Have you forgotten your... MORE


Last year when Seattle restaurateur Tom Douglas raised some of his workers’ wages to $15 an hour, he was hoping it would catch on.

He wanted to pass some of his profits on to his cooks. But also to kick fellow business owners in the butts. His message was: You can start raising wages on your own terms, or the city may do it for you.

As I wrote back then: “With the way the political winds are blowing, it seems Tom’s fellow capitalists around here have a choice. You can follow him. Or you can take your chances with the government.”

Well, Tom Douglas’ example did not catch on. And so we find ourselves, this week, at the moment he was predicting: The city appears set to try to dramatically force up the lower end of the wage scale citywide.

The details are to be decided — and may end up before voters in the fall. Mayor Ed Murray’s advisory committee of business and labor leaders has until Wednesday to come up with a plan. If it doesn’t, Murray says he’ll do it himself.

Most likely any plan will seek to move the minimum wage from $9.32 an hour to $15 in about a five-year time frame. Beyond that they are haggling the fine print.

I’ve had two objections to the $15-wage movement from the beginning. The first was that “$15 now” is too extreme. Nothing should ever be jacked up 60 percent all at once — not your taxes, your rent, or, if you’re a business, your labor costs. If they come out with a plan that lifts the wage more slowly — by, say, $1 a year — then that solves my first concern.

My second is more philosophical. I think workers should agitate for higher wages with their employers, not with the government. They can do this individually or, for more leverage, as a group (we try both here at The Seattle Times.)

In this movement, though, the unions and workers are sidestepping employers, petitioning the government directly to impose wages for them.

Labor leaders say they turned to this because the old ways weren’t working.

“It has become very hard to exercise collective-bargaining rights anymore, as corporations have had their run of things now for decades,” says David Freiboth, executive secretary of the King County Labor Council and also on the mayor’s $15- wage-advisory committee. “So yes — we made a conscious choice to turn to government this time.”

Workers would also have to be blind not to see the fantastic windfalls that businesses have been able to reap by hitting up the government.

In a sense this $15-wage movement is just the flip side of the Boeing corporate-welfare coin. Last fall Boeing went to government and not only scored the largest state tax breaks in U.S. history (in three days!), but also got the political establishment to help put the squeeze on Boeing’s workers to give up their pensions.

The $15 movement is using similar tactics — except aimed right back at business. It is workers, led by labor unions, going straight to government to try to put the squeeze on businesses for higher wages.

It’s easy to see why all this is happening. But is it going to lead to any better result than the Boeing mess?

Example: Last week, City Council members started talking about creating a Department of Labor Enforcement (because once the city starts setting wages for the first time, it may need to enforce them.) That’s the thing about more government rule-making — it inevitably leads to more government bureaucracy.

Another example: Some small businesses, the type that can’t go down to Olympia and extort the place Boeing-like, may end up as collateral damage (though a phased-in approach to the higher wage would go a long way to softening that.)

Stay tuned. But it looks to me like Tom Douglas was right. Businesses could have gotten out ahead of the stagnant-wage issue. It would have been better for them, certainly, and probably for taxpayers and maybe even for workers in the long run.

But they didn’t. So now we take our chances with the government.

Danny Westneat’s column appears Wednesday and Sunday. Reach him at 206-464-2086 or

Four weeks for 99 cents of unlimited digital access to The Seattle Times. Try it now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►