Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published June 2, 2014 at 4:36 PM | Page modified June 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM

  • Share:
             
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

NLRB set to dismiss complaints over Machinists’ hurried 777X vote

The NLRB appears set to reject the objections of some local Machinists to the vote that sealed Boeing’s decision to build the 777X jet in Everett.


Seattle Times aerospace reporter

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
@toolmaker SUGGEST you learn the difference between various NLRB filings Do you know fora fact such a filing was NOT... MORE
let the gnashing of teeth begin... MORE
This should finally shut up Hansie101, Steve Ramsey and the know-it-all buttinski from that other bargaining unit.... MORE

advertising

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) appears set to reject the objections of some local Machinists to the vote that sealed Boeing’s decision to build the 777X jet in Everett.

Such a ruling will kill the faint hope by some Machinists that the vote that froze their pensions — approved by a margin of less than 1 percent — could be overturned.

Individual members of International Association of Machinists (IAM) District 751 who had filed complaints with the NLRB about the fairness of the vote received letters Friday offering them the option to either withdraw their complaints or have them dismissed.

Robley Evans, president of Local F, was one of the activists who filed a complaint. Evans said he will appeal the decision through the NLRB’s appeals process.

The charge was that the IAM’s national leadership unfairly pushed through the deal with Boeing by scheduling a surprise vote on very short notice for Friday, Jan. 3.

District 751’s leadership, which opposed the deal, wasn’t aware of the vote until the Christmas break had begun, so it had no opportunity to call a meeting of its members.

On the day of the vote, many older, more militant IAM members were still out of town, having extended their holiday break.

The grounds cited in the NLRB letter for rejecting the complaints are technical and do not address the fairness of the vote.

The letter told the complainants the IAM national leadership had no obligation even to hold a vote, Evans said.

The IAM leadership “has the authority to accept or reject Boeing’s offer without a ratification vote,” the letter said, adding that therefore “the union owed you no duty of fair representation ... with respect to the manner in which the vote was conducted.”

The NLRB’s regional attorney, Anne Pomerantz, declined to comment on the status of the complaints except to say a final decision will be issued by the end of this month.

Dominic Gates: (206) 464-2963 or dgates@seattletimes.com



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Bake cookies for a cause

Bake cookies for a cause

Get 23 scrumptious recipes in our "Quintessential Cookies" e-book. One dollar of your $3.95 purchase goes to Fund For The Needy.

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►