Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published May 17, 2014 at 8:00 PM | Page modified May 18, 2014 at 8:29 AM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Emotions run deep in East Texas over Keystone pipeline

While the debate rages over the northern part of the project, the $2.6 billion southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline is already pumping crude 487 miles to Texas Gulf Coast refineries.


Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Pipeline by the numbers

$2.6 billion

The money it took to build the southern leg.

700,000

Barrels of oil per day the Keystone XL pipeline should ultimately pump into Texas.

300,000

Barrels of oil per day the pipeline was pumping when oil began flowing in January.

20,000

Jobs that the southern leg (already built) and the northern leg (stretching up to Canada) should create.

487

Miles from Cushing, Okla., to refineries on the Texas coast.

61%

Proportion of people who favor building the northern leg.

36

Width of the pipeline, in inches.

Source: TransCanada, Fort Worth Star-Telegram research

Reader Comments
Hide / Show comments
It is obscene that government took land from a private landowner to give to a big corporation. Why do Republicans... MORE
@Thuja500 Good question. It might have a lot to do with who lines their pockets. MORE
This article quotes Professor of Geological Sciences Bill Fisher of the University of Texas as touting an "ample energy... MORE

advertising

PARIS, Texas — Deep in the heart of East Texas, gently sloping fields, fertile cropland and willowy pine trees stretch as far as the eye can see.

Horses and cattle roam the grassy land — sometimes just feet above an underground pipeline stretching from Cushing, Okla., to the Texas coast that has sparked an international battle over politics, the economy and the environment.

While the debate rages over the northern part of the project, the $2.6 billion southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline is already pumping crude 487 miles to Texas Gulf Coast refineries.

The part of the pipeline that began operating in January was fast-tracked by President Obama and has been called an economic boon, a job creator, a way to help the U.S. become more energy independent — and one of the “safest” pipelines built to date.

But some who live along the path of the TransCanada pipeline say they fear the day a leak occurs and the contamination it could unleash on Texas land and waterways.

In recent years, the issue prompted legal challenges and spurred protesters to turn out, staging hunger strikes, chaining themselves to equipment and camping in trees, hoping to prevent progress along the route or cause Texas refineries to shut down or opt out of using the pipeline.

“What’s good and bad about it is in the eyes of the beholder,” said Bill Fisher, a professor of geological sciences at the University of Texas at Austin. “But this is a main way that we move crude oil around. It’s still the dominant way of transport.

“If you are interested in an ample energy supply and transporting crude oil in the United States ... the pipeline is by far the most common way of transport,” he said. “If you have a pipeline across your ranch, you’re likely to not be very happy about it.”

In this midterm-election year, Obama has yet to say whether he will approve the northern portion.

That doesn’t ease the minds of some Texans who have spent years trying to keep the southern pipeline off their property and worrying about a leak.

“There’s going to be a leak somewhere,” said Julia Trigg Crawford, a Northeast Texas landowner who unsuccessfully fought for years to keep the pipeline off her family’s land. “It’s not a question of if it will leak but when it will leak.

“We are all watching for something to happen.”

Oil flowing

The Keystone XL Gulf Coast Project stretches 36-inch-wide pipeline across 487 miles to pump oil into Nederland to serve the Gulf Coast marketplace.

If TransCanada gains presidential approval, the northern leg will stretch to Canada and boost the oil that flows toward Texas. The ultimate goal is to pump about 700,000 barrels a day to the refineries.

When oil began flowing in January, it was at a rate of around 300,000 barrels a day. That has increased to between 400,000 and 500,000, said Shawn Howard, a TransCanada spokesman.

“Everything has gone really well,” he said.

Howard said the pipeline, designed to move both heavy and light oil, is safe for several reasons: It was built with some of the strongest steel that exists, it is buried deeper, and it has more automated shut-off valves.

Satellite imagery

The pipeline also uses advanced technology such as satellite imagery that is refreshed every five seconds and can quickly pinpoint problems.

“We have said this would be the safest pipeline built,” Howard said. “We understand the concern that some people have. We share that concern. Nobody wants to see something happen.”

Officials have long touted the economic impact.

Howard said the southern leg created 4,844 jobs; the southern and northern leg together should bring about 20,000.

A recent poll showed that 61 percent — with more support from Republicans than Democrats — favor building the pipeline, according to the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.

Court battle

Crawford’s fight to keep the pipeline off her family’s farm, about 150 miles northeast of Fort Worth, has nearly ended.

It began in 2010 when she moved to Direct — about 20 miles outside Paris — to manage the 640-acre Red’Arc Farm, which her grandfather bought in 1948.

“I expected the quiet life,” the 55-year-old former Texas A&M University basketball player said with a wry smile.

She found herself moving from “discussions” with TransCanada, which offered to pay for a sliver of her family’s land, to a full-blown fight that included a lawsuit the Texas Supreme Court recently decided not to hear.

Many other landowners, including Crawford’s neighbor Henry Duncan, welcomed the pipeline.

“I’ve got one line that’s coming across the backside of me, and my cattle are eating on top of it and it’s not hurting them any,” he has told the media. “So I don’t see how this can hurt.”

But Crawford and her family protested — asking the company to shift its route to avoid their property, as other carriers had — because of concerns about how a pipeline could affect the land, the water supply and Caddo Indian burial grounds.

Offers for the use of their land ranged from $7,000 to $21,000, but discussions ended in 2011 and the family was told that part of the property was condemned. A $10,395 check compensating the family was left at the Lamar County Courthouse and has yet to be claimed.

After losing her lawsuit against TransCanada in both the lower and appeals courts, Crawford appealed to the Texas Supreme Court. On March 21, it declined to hear the case.

“I felt like I was kicked in the gut,” she said, adding that she’s weighing whether to ask the court to reconsider.

Now, she looks out her kitchen window every day and sees the land — less than 2 acres — that was taken for the pipeline.

“It represents something that was taken from me against my will,” she said. “I don’t care if it was less than 2 feet. A foreign corporation said they had more right to it than I did.”

On the first day the pipeline became active in January, Crawford said, she was informed that “sweet crude” was flowing under her property.

But she understands that plans are to transport “the nasty stuff.”

She and others worry that the pipeline will ship bitumen, a dense blend of oil and sand with the consistency of peanut butter.

This is so thick that it must be diluted or pumped at higher temperatures, and with greater pressure, than regular crude.

The fear is the higher temperature or higher pressure is more likely to break through the pipeline.

And some environmentalists fear that bitumen, which they call dirty and toxic, would be hard to clean up if it spills.

Proponents say studies have shown that carrying this oil is as safe as carrying crude oil.

“This product has been moving into the U.S. for decades,” said Howard, of TransCanada. “From our perspective, oil is oil. It will come through the pipeline.”

A recent Public Citizen report raised questions about Keystone XL’s southern leg, citing concerns about the construction and inspection system, erosion, dents, sags, repairs and more.

“We are very much concerned about the integrity of the pipeline,” said Rita Beving, a member of the executive committee for the Sierra Club and a North Texas organizer for Public Citizen.

Howard said TransCanada added 57 additional safety and operating procedures on the pipeline through Texas that aren’t typically used on other pipelines.

“We raised the bar on safety,” Howard said.

Safety concerns

Bernard Weinstein, associate director of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University’s business school, said the safety concerns are unfounded.

“I think what’s happened is you’ve had a lot of environmentalists trying to stir up controversy by claiming there are safety issues related to the Gulf Coast project,” he said. “That’s a straw man. Accidents will happen, and occasionally you do find ruptures of oil and gas pipelines.

“But this is a pipeline built in 2013 and 2014 with the best available materials and technology,” Weinstein said. “The probability of a leak or spill is very, very low. Does that mean there will never be an incident? In the next 100 years, there probably will be. There is no human activity that is totally incident-free.”

Business leaders, enthusiastic about job creation, support the project.

“Stronger energy security and lower gas prices are not the only things that come with the KXL pipeline,” said Jim Rich, president of the Greater Beaumont Chamber of Commerce.

“Construction will bring new jobs, new customers, new business and new investment. New infrastructure projects will boost the economy,” Rich said.

Talk about the pipeline arises from time to time at a popular coffee shop in Paris, not far from where the pipeline stretches through Lamar County.

Alyson Yoder, a 21-year-old barista at the Paris Coffee Co., said she has seen only good things from the pipeline.

She explored her now-ex-boyfriend’s property when the pipeline was being installed there. She said she walked beside it, even tried to see in it.

“When it’s through town, the bars, restaurants, hotels get a lot of business,” she said. “I think it’s a good idea. It’s good for Paris.”



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Seattle Sketcher Book

Seattle Sketcher Book

Due to popular demand, the pre-sale price of $29.95 is extended until October 5!

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►