Skip to main content
Advertising

Originally published Saturday, April 19, 2014 at 8:00 PM

  • Share:
           
  • Comments (0)
  • Print

Taxing talk about Social Security benefits

A reader raises a question about the use of Social Security benefits by people with means.


Syndicated columnist

advertising

Investing

Q: I don’t understand why the really wealthy use Social Security and Medicare. They use them because they like vacations, multiple homes and cars, and lots of shopping trips.

A: It’s easy to believe that other people have so much income they don’t really need it or that it is spent foolishly.

But the reality is that Social Security provides a large percentage of total income for the vast majority of retired Americans.

Taxing that income is a burdensome tax on middle-class retirees. The tax hurts our economy because it reduces consumer spending. Every dime of that money would certainly be spent on consumer goods and services.

Here’s an example: A couple who had a pre-retirement income of $90,000 (both worked) retire with $36,000 in Social Security benefits.

They’ve also been active savers and have $600,000 in their 401(k) plans. This amount is well above average, but at a 5 percent withdrawal rate, their standard of living is still no higher than it was while they were working. They have no defined-benefit pensions.

If they draw at a 5 percent rate from their investments, or $30,000 a year, they will have a total income of $66,000, and they will be paying taxes on some of their Social Security benefits.

Indeed, the taxation of those benefits will increase their income-tax bill from $763 to $1,734.

If they were less successful with their savings, or drew less from them, their income tax would also be significantly lower.

Cutting back to $24,000 from their 401(k) plan would drop their tax bill by about $1,100. But they would also have $4,900 a year less to spend.

That’s a real-life practical example for a broad group of working Americans.

With a total income of $66,000, it isn’t too likely that they would use their Social Security benefits “because they like vacations, multiple homes and cars, and lots of shopping trips.”

What we’re talking about is a harsh tax on the nation’s savers, compounded by a Federal Reserve policy that keeps interest rates on safe savings punitively low.

More than a few readers have said that seniors have tax breaks and pay less in taxes than those still working. Not to mention that retirees also have deeply subsidized health care from Medicare.

I think that misses the point. To me, the issues are different. First, the taxation of benefits is a sneaky, dishonest tax, designed to slowly expand as inflation causes more and more people to pay it.

If only some of the current generation of retirees pay the tax, it will certainly be paid by all of their children, decades after the lawmakers who passed it have left office. Taxing the next generation is another form of taxation without representation.

Second, it is definitely a middle-class tax because it falls only on middle-class incomes — such as the example above.

Questions: scott@scottburns.com

Copyright 2014, Universal Press Syndicate



Want unlimited access to seattletimes.com? Subscribe now!

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Seattle Sketcher Book

Seattle Sketcher Book

Due to popular demand, the pre-sale price of $29.95 is extended until October 5!

Advertising

Advertising


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►